Question: To what extent do religious beliefs today influence how cities are bulit in Egypt?
Answer: now they are going through artifacts and figuring out how they built things and now they use buildings that they want to build just like the pyramids
question answered by
(jacemorris04)
The fallacious arguments are:
The Civil War was about Northern businessman trying to bankrupt Southern farmers by emancipating their enslaving work force.
England developed a fair and just taxation system for the American Colonies.
<em>Both sentences have fallacious arguments.
</em>
A fallacy is a wrong idea or a belief that is not true. In the case of the question, the first sentence is a fallacy because the Civil War was not about that argument. The Union wanted to have abolishment ideas that were not supported by the Confederated States. In the case of the second sentence, that is also a fallacy. The taxation system imposed by the English was not fair. It was a heavy taxation system that upset the colonies and that was one of the reasons to start the American Revolution.
Answer:
A student council approves vending machines in the cafeteria.
HOPE IT HELPS :)
PLEASE MARK IT THE BRAINLIEST!
Answer:
They could take more damage from enemy power.
Reason this is an answer: Remember that during the Civil War, all sides (as well as the world) continued to use cannon balls, which is generally a sphere made of pig iron, and was loaded into a cannon. These kinds of rounds packed more punch rather than the penetration quality needed to go through iron. Ironclads generally shrugged off the damage that would usually penetrate the wooden-ships, causing a hole in which water would sip in, and slowly drown.
They relied on power.
Reason this is an answer: While I'm not sure what "power" it is referring too, they do rely on many different powers. They first rely on the power of the economical situation of a country, in which the country is able to not only build the ship, but also produce the iron & create enough iron to armor the ship up. Power also can refer to armament as well as crews and protection, in which all of these are heavily relied upon when in battles. Without the experience and battle-hardening of all of these, the ships would not have as much of an impact as it should have.
It can be, but is not necessary, at least during the Civil War:
They could have more weapons and firepower.
Later on as the ironclads evolved they were able to hold more weapons and have a higher % of firepower, however, the early days (or the days of the Merrimack and Monitor) they did not have more fire power than the ordinary wooden ships both navies had. Remember, they relied more on their armor than in firepower. However, this changed over the years.
~
