Answer:
<u>CLASSICAL</u> macroeconomists focused on the <u>LONG-RUN</u> effects of <u>MONETARY</u> policy on the aggregate price level, ignoring any <u>SHORT-RUN</u> effects on aggregate output.
Explanation:
Classical macroeconomists focused mostly on the long-run since they perceived the economy was self-adjusting. That means that they should only set a guideline for the economy, and the economy itself would adjust to fulfill that guideline.
For example, just because the Fed carries out an expansionary monetary policy by lowering interest rates, it doesn't mean that the economy will start to grow and unemployment will lower. Other adjustments are necessary, like a tax reduction or an increase in government spending.
<span>The statistic of the labor-force participation rate shows the number of people participating in the work force as either actively employed or looking for work, as opposed to those who are not employed and are not seeking work. Another way of thinking about it is that it shows us how many people are available in the work force.</span>
Answer: $315.47
Explanation:
As this requires equal annual payments, it makes it an annuity. The $1,000 debt will be the present value of the annuity so a present value of annuity formula can be used:
1,000 = Annuity * ( 1 - ( 1 + rate) ^ -n) / rate
1,000 = Annuity * ( 1 - ( 1 + 10%)⁻⁴ ) / 10%
1,000 = Annuity * 3.169865
Annuity = 1,000/3.169865
Annuity = $315.47
Answer:
A. $18, 097
Explanation:
The net present value is the present value of after tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested.
The npv can be calculated using a financial calculator
Cash flow in year 0 = $-80,000
Cash flow in year 1 = $34,000
Cash flow in year 2 = $37,000
Cash flow in year 3 = $26,000
Cash flow in year 4 = $25,000
I = 10%
NPV = $18,097.12
To find the NPV using a financial calacutor:
1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
2. After inputting all the cash flows, press the NPV button, input the value for I, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
3. Press compute
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
The difference in human capital explains $7,863 of the income per worker gap while the difference in physical capital explains $20,181 of the income per worker gap.
Explanation:
Human capital refers to the skills, knowledge, and efforts of the people in producing goods and services. It is also known simply as labor. Physical capital refers to the "man-made" goods that assist in production, including machinery, equipment, and technological items such as computers.
In the given scenario, the income per worker in the United States is $82,359 - $54,315 = $28,044 more than the income per worker in South Korea. This is explained by differences in both the level of technology (i.e. physical capital) and the capability of workers (i.e. human capital).
We are informed that the income per worker in South Korea would be $74,496 if it had the same level of technology as the United States. This means that $74,496 - $54,315 = $20,181 of the income per worker gap between the two countries is explained by differences in physical capital. Hence the remaining difference of $28,044 - $20,181 = $7,863 is explained by differences in human capital between the two countries.
