Which two statements correctly identify the effect that a switch in narration from third-person omniscient to third-person limit
ed has on a story? The switch in narration increases the proximity of the narrator to the main character. The true details about past and future events are more easily shown to the reader. The reader can perceive information only through the filter of a single character. The inner thoughts of all the characters are revealed to the reader by the narrator.
The first and the third statements clearly identify the effect <span>that a switch in narration from third-person omniscient to third-person limited has on a story.</span>
The two statements that correctly identify the effect that a switch in narration from third-person omniscient to third-person limited has on a story are:
*The switch in narration increases the proximity of the narrator to the main character
*The reader can perceive information only through the filter of a single character
Explanation:
The third-person omniscient presents the events from a wider point of view, which helps the reader to create a better mental image of the general events and their surroundings, when you switch to a third person limited all this gets reduced to the point of view and interpretation of the specific character that is telling the story.
Dr. Lanyon has learned damaging new information about Dr. Jekyll. I know this because after Utterson asks if Lanyon has seen Dr Jekyll, his face changes and he says he never wants to see him again.
