1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anettt [7]
3 years ago
9

Indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statement:”it is better that ten guilty persons go free than that one

innocent person suffer conviction.” Explain your answer
History
2 answers:
Aleksandr-060686 [28]3 years ago
8 0
Well this is mainly a subjective question. the answer is supposed to come from what you believe but personally I disagree.
just olya [345]3 years ago
8 0

I personally believe that this is the case. The answer is asking you to wonder what action is a worst evil. Whether it is better that guilty people are free, or that a single innocent person is in prison. I agree that this is the case, because I believe that the mental and emotional damage to prisoners is enormous. People in prisons suffer from loneliness, isolation, abuse, and the inability to lead their lives the way they want. As difficult as this is for guilty people, it would be even more so for someone who is free. On the other hand, if guilty people are free, there is no certainty that they would commit a crime again, or that they cannot successfully reintegrate in society.

You might be interested in
Put these events in the order in which they happened.​
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

1. Treaty of Paris (1763)

2. Sugar Act (1764)

3. Stamp Act (1765)

4. Townshend Acts (1767-1768)

5. Boston Massacre (1770)

6. Boston Tea Party (1773)

7. Intolerable Acts (1774)

8. Battle of Quebec (1775)

6 0
3 years ago
What is one type of play Shakespeare wrote?
egoroff_w [7]
Shakespeare wrote Comedies like All’s Well That Ends Well, As You Like it, CymbelineThe Comedy of Errors, Love’s Labour’s Lost, and <span>Measure for Measure</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think these policies are needed to limit population growth, or do you couple think that it is unfair of the government to
Vlad [161]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, this question is incomplete because does not include the policies it is referring to. However, we can comment on the following.

Indeed, there have to be policies aimed to control the growth of the population. Otherwise, the federal government could not keep track of the natalities on a monthly and yearly basis. This control is needed because the government has to be aware of the impact of the number of newborns on public services.

However, all the controls instilled by the government have to be reasonable and respect the human rights of the parents. Nothing has to be imposed that does not respect their rights.

The government expects that parents can be responsible enough to bring the number of children they can take care of. To not compromise the health service industry and the public education system, and other public services.

4 0
3 years ago
Describe the Hepburn Act. What did the act achieve, and why was it different from previous legislation?
frutty [35]

                                                  <u>%Question%</u>

 Describe the Hepburn Act. What did the act achieve, and why was it different from the previous.

<u>                                                                                                                                     </u>

                                                 <u>  &Answer&</u>

<em>The Hepburn Act is a 1906 United States federal law that gave the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) the power to set maximum railroad rates and extended its jurisdiction. This led to the discontinuation of free passes to loyal shippers.[1] In addition, the ICC could view the railroads' financial records, a task simplified by standardized bookkeeping systems. For any railroad that resisted, the ICC's conditions would remain in effect until the outcome of legislation said otherwise</em>

8 0
3 years ago
The case of United States v. Stevens in 2010 is an example of the Supreme Court’s power of
dolphi86 [110]
Free speech is your answer

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Where were the Aztecs told to build their capital? in the highlands of Guatemala along the coast of Florida where they saw an ea
    5·2 answers
  • What buildings in new york city were hit by the planes on 9/11?
    10·1 answer
  • Which is an example of federal property taken over by seceding states?
    12·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer
    13·1 answer
  • Which was part of the Roman republic‘s representative government
    9·2 answers
  • In what part of Africa did the practice of slavery most deplete the population?
    7·1 answer
  • Question 8 (4 points)
    10·2 answers
  • How many muscles are found in the human body?
    15·1 answer
  • Question 6 of 10
    12·1 answer
  • How do Martin Luther King Jr.'s experiences in the South affect his view of the Emancipation Proclamation 100 years after it bec
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!