Answer:
The incomplete part of the question is "Using a cap-and-trade system of tradable emission allowances will eliminate half of the sulfur dioxide pollution at a cost of $1 million per year. If the permits are not tradable, what will be the cost of eliminating half of the pollution? If permits cannot be traded, then the cost of the pollution reduction will be $1 million per year." The full question is attched as picture as well
1) Tradable permit system
Then lower MAC firm will abate the all pollution units
Then as MAC1 = $250, MAC2 = $275
Firm 1 = Consolidated electric
Firm 2 = Commonwealth utility
Then 1 will sell all permits to 2, at a price between $250 & $275.
So total cost of abatement of 20 units = MAC1 * 20
= $250 * 20 Unit
= $5,000
2) Non-tradable permits
Total cost = MC1*10 + MC2*10
= $2,500 + $2,750
= $5,250
Answer:
D) not able to be calculated from the information given.
Explanation:
Consumer surplus is the difference between willingness to pay of a consumer and the price actually paid for a good or service.
The price paid by Smith is $205,000 but there's no information on the willingness to pay of Smith. Therefore, the consumer surplus can't be calculated.
I hope my answer helps you.
The correct answer is the intensive distribution. An
intensive distribution is being defined as having to get products to many
outlets as possible by which the consumers are likely to encounter and see the
product everywhere that they may go to.
If the total production exceeds the total expenditures this means that there are more goods are produced than the demand of each households. Thus, this will lead to an increase of inventory. Then this will signal the manufacturing firm that they have overproduced the goods which will lead to cut back the production. This leads to lesser prices and/or unsold goods alongside with the likelihood of unemployment. Therefore the answer is d.
