The process of reasoning to a general conclusion through observation of specific cases is called Inductive Reasoning.
<h3>What is Inductive Reasoning?</h3>
Inductive reasoning is seen as a kind of a process or a method that is known to be used in the drawing of conclusions.
This can be done by going from a particular point to a general point and it is known to be one that is often contrasted with deductive reasoning.
Therefore, based on the above, The process of reasoning to a general conclusion through observation of specific cases is called Inductive Reasoning.
Learn more about reasoning from
brainly.com/question/25175983
#SPJ1
Answer:
Direct democracy
Explanation:
Direct democracy is a type of democracy in which all citizens of the country have the right to vote directly.
Example:
Ancient Athens
Dictatorship
A type of government in which people are suppressed and don't have the right to vote. There is no democracy.
Representative democracy
A type of democracy in which people vote for representative. In other words it's parliamentary.
Example:
Ethiopia
Tabitha lives in a country where people experience direct democracy.
Hope this helps ;) ❤❤❤
Answer: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Explanation: The Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002 that is also known as Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act offers protection to Whistle blowers.
The act seeks to check for fraud in public companies.
Public companies are literally owned by the general public that is the general public are the investors in these companies.
In some of these companies, some corrupt executives might want to perpetuate fraud and declare loss to the investors.
This act was established to crack down on fraud of any sort in public companies and also protect whistle blowers who help in uncovering/reporting the fraud to the appropriate authorities.
U.S. Congress is the name of the united states government legislative branch
By identifying the true and false statements about the information age and modern knowledge work, we conclude that the true statements include "Knowledge or information work is increasingly common in the twenty-first century."
Other true statements about the information age and modern knowledge work include the following:
- The average worker is working more hours in a week than their predecessor in the pre–Information Age workplace.
- The rise of new technologies may roll back many of the original effects of the Industrial Revolution.
On the other hand, the False Statement about the information age and modern knowledge work is:
- Telecommuting has benefits, but it also increases workplace distractions and reduces worker productivity.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded rust the information age and modern knowledge have greatly affected how humans work compared to the previous centuries.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/19536454
