Businesses reduce their incentives that will lead to minimizing their ability to carry out their part for social responsibility of the triple bottom line.
The triple bottom line is an obligation on businesses to not just look for their profit but include and maintain a good balance between these factors:
Businesses should follow the Triple bottom line:
- Making sure that there is positive social welfare on their part.
- Maintain ecological footprint
Thus, The correct answer would be - the ability of businesses to meet both their social responsibility and Triple bottom line is minimized and not as it was in normal conditions.
Learn more about social responsibility:
brainly.com/question/1339420
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Modify.
Explanation:
The SCAMPER approach is useful when analyzing how to implement new ideas into existing products or services. SCAMPER stands for <em>Substitute, Combine, Adapt, Modify, Put to another use, Eliminate, </em>and <em>Reverse</em>.
The Modifying function implies asking questions such as "<em>What could you add to modify this product</em>?" or "<em>What element of this product could you strengthen to create something new</em>?" which looks for spotting lacking features of products to improve them according to consumers' preference.
Thus, <em>by deciding to change the spices of Indian traditional food for less spicy ingredients to fit Americans' food habits, Rashmi is using the modifying component of the SCAMPER tool.</em>
Most people criticize monopolies for charging excessive prices, but economists disagree because monopolies do not produce enough goods and services to be allocatively efficient.
What is Allocative efficiency?
Efficiency, whether allocational or allocative, is the quality of a market where all products and services are efficiently divided among consumers in an economy. It happens when parties can use the precise and easily accessible information reflected in the market to decide how to employ their resources.
Why is a monopoly allocatively inefficient?
Companies with monopoly power can set prices higher than in a market with competitors. Because in monopolies the price is higher than MC, an unregulated monopoly provider is very likely to be allocatively inefficient. In a market where there is competition, prices would be reduced and more people would benefit from buying the product.
Learn more about Allocative efficiency: brainly.com/question/23879464
#SPJ4
Answer:
to meet the competitive requirements of customers, suppliers and business partners.
Explanation:
The world is slowly drifting towards a global age and we all need internet based technologies to keep up. The suppliers need the technologies to advertise their goods and keep up with customer demands and satisfaction. The customers need it to be able to find things they want and also get in touch with their favourite suppliers. The business partners need it to know the in and out of their investment and keep abreast of the business track.
<span>IF ONE OF THE PARTIES OF A COURT CASE DOES NOT AGREE WITH THE THE VERDICT THEY HAVE THE OPTION OF TRYING TO APPEAL IT AT A HIGHER COURT. IF THE COURT DECIDES DECIDES TO ALLOW THE APPEAL THEY HAVE THE OPTION OF ANOTHER COURT TRIAL.</span>
