Radio and television broadcasters must receive a license from the government because, according to American law, the public possesses the airwaves. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) gives these licenses and is in charge of controlling the airwaves.
<h3>Who said television is a extensive wasteland?</h3>
The phrase "vast wasteland" was meant to Minow by his friend, reporter and freelance author John Bartlow Martin. Martin had recently watched twenty straight hours of television as research for a magazine piece, and figured it was "a vast wasteland of junk".
<h3>What regulates the schedules we see on television?</h3>
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is an independent agent of the United States federal government that regulates transmissions by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable across the United States.
To learn more about Federal Communications, refer
brainly.com/question/1407895
#SPJ4
Explanation:
Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.
But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."
A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".
But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.
Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.
Mrs. Louis could ask Mr.Hollembeak for <em>further details about his findings and report.</em>
The discussion <em>aims to get the thruth</em> about a possible leak of information by not properly encrypted files. Mr. Hollembeak defends himself stating that concerning his knowledge and responsabilities he is innocent of any negligence for his department's security protocol was up to date.
If Mrs. Louis wants to be an effective participant in the discussion she could ask Mr.Hollembeak further details about his findings and report in order to discover any contradictions in his statement and then feel free to move to another topic.
Answer:
Sleeping Bear Dunes offers something to do all year round.
Explanation:
Visitors can hike the dunes in the warmer months and ski and ice fish in the colder months. Sleeping Bear Dunes offers something for the whole year.
Hope this helps.
It seems like she is telling him she doesn’t believe in witches.
