Napoleon Bonaparte had a contradictory character. He had an unusual personality. The writer Germaine de Staël described him as being ‘neither good nor violent, neither gentle nor cruel’, which denotes that he was <em>neutral</em>, a<em> calm </em>and <em>calculated/prudent </em>person. he was considered<em> unique </em>and <em>very special </em>for the actions he took and the thinking he put into taking decisions. By the French writer Stendhal, he was seen as <em>very </em><span><em>ambitious</em> (''endowed with amazing abilities and a dangerous ambition’'). He was very <em>firm</em> when it was about facing his <span>opponents. Even more, he could get even mad when his passions had to face disputes. He was a very difficult person, but that made him more <em>powerful </em>than the others. Also, it is said that ''his diversity (<em>diverse</em>) made him <em>fascinating''</em>. He was hostile to his older brother. He had a military, legislative and <span>diplomatic talent. |He was<em> popular</em>, but his more of defects were: picky (<span>squeamish), selfish, egocentric.</span></span></span></span>
Answer:
Wasn't he a trustbuster?
Explanation:
Im pretty sure they wouldn't like him because of that so... yea
I really hope this helps :)
Also if u want you can make me brainli est but you don't have to
Anyways have a good day
That they were called the border ruffians
We, as the people of the United States, establish the Constitution in order to<span> achieve Justice, insure domestic </span>Tranquility<span>, provide for the common </span>defence<span>, promote the general </span>Welfare<span>, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our </span><span>Posterity. </span>
