We can't answer this question because you didn't show the "following"
Answer:
- Now that the very evidence that lead to conviction of the defendant, that person will no longer serve the sentence given as a punishment as a result of the crime committed.
- Yes, the defendant would be free to go for now, unless they can produce any more evidence to charge him with the crime he allegedly committed.
- Conventionally it would go back to the trial court until and unless specified otherwise by the judge.
- It could go all the way up to the supreme court depending on whether the legal counsel handling the case puts in a request for it.
Hope that answers the question, have a great day!
Explanation:
The journal entries are as follows
On December 31
Bad debt expense Dr $4,115 ($823,000 × 0.50%)
To Allowance for doubtful debts $4,115
(Being the bad debt expense is recorded)
On Feb 01
Allowance for doubtful debts Dr $412
To Account receivable $412
(Being the uncollectible amount is recorded)
On June 5
Account receivable $412
To Allowance for doubtful debts Dr $412
(Being the uncollectible amount is recorded)
On June 5
Cash Dr $412
To Account receivable $412
(Being the cash received is recorded)
When it comes to this context, nothing is sure to be a success, so no
Answer:
$345,000
Explanation:
Since Halka Company uses a maturity matching approach, it must match its short term working capital with its short term debts, and its long term working capital with its long term debts. Halka's assets should be compensated with a corresponding debt instrument of similar maturity.
Since Halka's assets vary form $345,000 to $410,000, its long term debt plus equity should match at least $345,000.
