Answer: Our group will suggest strategy of Contraction of product mix
<u>Explanation:</u>
Our group will suggest a contraction of the product mix strategy. As per this strategy, we can eliminate one or more product lines or product items from the product mix. This will contract our product mix. The products like medical uniforms and women jeans which are having no sale and are not profitable now can be eliminated.
A company can target the customer for those products which are still in the product mix.
I really want to say income statement
Answer:
Cost of goods sold = $8,800
Explanation:
<em>The cost of goods is represents amount incurred to make available what has been sold. It is computed as follows:</em>
<em>Cost of goods sold = opening stock + purchases - closing inventory</em>
It is useful to determine the cost of goods so as to calculate the gross profit margin. The gross profit is the sales revenue less cost of goods sold.
So we can compute same for the sporting equipment store as follows:
Cost of goods sold = 3,800 + 7,800 - 2,800
= $8,800
Cost of goods sold = $8,800
Answer:
D. continuous review system
Explanation:
In the context of manufacturing it seems that the system being described would be a continuous review system. Like mentioned in the question this is a system that automatically adjusts the stock level in real time when a product moves in or out of stock, and automatically triggers an order for more stock as soon as the stock level hits a low quantity point is hit.
Answer:
Answer Illustration : Opportunity Cost of producing Wine is lesser in France, Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters is lesser in Tunisia. So, France has comparative advantage in Wine, Tunisia in Sweater.
Explanation:
Opportunity Cost is the cost of next best alternative foregone while choosing an alternative.
Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters & Wine in France & Tunisia are quantities of other goods (Sweaters or Tunias) sacrifised while choosing either. Sweater Opportunity Cost - Wines sacrifised, Wine Opportunity Cost - Sweaters sacrifised.
The country has a comparative advantage in a good if it can produce it with relatively less opportunity cost (in terms of other good sacrifised) than other country.
Ex : Production Possibilities
Wine Sweater Trade off (Wine :Sweater)
France 10 5 1:0.5 or 2:1
Tunisia 8 24 1:3 or 0.33:1
- France produces Wine with lesser opportunity cost (sweater sacrifised) than Tunisia [0.5 sweater < 3 sweaters] ; it has comparative advantage in Wine.
- Tunisia produces Sweater with less opportunity cost (wine sacrifised) than France [ 0.33 wine < 2 wines] ; it has comparative advantage in Tunisia
