1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
S_A_V [24]
3 years ago
7

Identify and explain ONE historically specific example of intensified human land use in the period 1450– 1750 C.E. that would su

pport the author’s argument. Identify and explain ONE historically specific example from the period before 1450 C.E. in which humans interacted with the environment in ways similar to those described in the passage. Identify and explain ONE late-twentieth-century development that likely explains historians’ interest in the subject of the passage.
History
1 answer:
Len [333]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Monoculture

Explanation:

Rising human numbers have increased pressure on the land; selective agriculture or monoculture (the use of one or two favored crops) has reduced biodiversity.

In the 17th century the Dutch practised monoculture (spices) in the Indonesian colony for the benefit of the Dutch Republic and a little later the British in India cultivated opium in large quantities for the Chinese market.

During the classic Maya empire (roughly from 200 to 800 C.E.) the main crops were just corn (sacred in all Mesoamerica) and beans.

There is an interesting monocultural parallel with certain crops (marihuana, avocado) produced in Mexico nowadays, there is one difference though:

Corn, beans and gourds were necessary for surviving; spices, opium and marihuana were not.

You might be interested in
Which lantform has the MOST direct impact on population distribution in South Asia?
meriva

Answer:

mountains

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
May i get some help on this question
posledela

Answer:

I think it is "c", but I'm not sure.

Explanation:

The legend states "Migration Corridors". The map is portarying the massive migration process done by African Americans from 1916 to 1970.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were two reasons for the War of 1812?
iragen [17]
I had to look this up but here you go I hope I helped!!!

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did federal government use a la issued-faire approach to big business?
exis [7]

Answer:

Because laissez-faire basically means freedom which the government gave business to sell at any price they would like for the goods.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How would the result of World War II have been different if the South would have won the Civil War, dividing America into two di
Snowcat [4.5K]

Answer:

The Nazis win and a weak Nazi regime would be established.

Explanation:

The Southern Embargo on cotton led Britain and France to become less reliant on American cotton. Colonies like India and Egypt decreased Britain and France's reliance on American cotton, which was a staple of the Southern economy. The South emerged economically devastated, and had a long recovery. But if they did not return to the Union, and they could not rely on Northern industry, this recovery would be even slower. And with the division, both parts of the union would be significantly weaker. For this reason, America would have played a less significant role in WWII. The result is speculative of course, but it's possible that if America decided not to enter, or could not produce a strong army, then the Nazis would have had a much easier time with their goal. I think that the only scenario where the Nazis would have won is an instance where they developed nuclear bombs first--and used a scorched Earth strategy to eliminate the Russian threat. This would be my speculation, but past victory, it's hard to say what would have happened. The Roman Government lasted for thousands of years, and perhaps the Nazi regime could last for a while before becoming de-stabilized, but I don't think it would have been a strong centralized regime. The reason I say this is because not even Caesar or Napoleon (brilliant diplomats and military strategists) could not achieve this. But this (of course) is speculative.

(Fun question, never done "hypothetical history")

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 1968, who was the antiwar candidate for President? George Wallace Robert Kennedy Lyndon B. Johnson Eugene McCarthy
    8·2 answers
  • What led to the radicalization of the french revolution?
    11·1 answer
  • WILL MARK BRAINLIEST PLUS 20 POINTS!! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP IM BEGGING
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following grew to be significant social movements of the 1990s?
    8·2 answers
  • In which fourteen points the main goal of removing German troops from occupied lands was to
    9·1 answer
  • A cup warming up after hot tea is poured into it is an example of _____. A. radiation B. convection C. conduction
    5·1 answer
  • The declaration of independence asserts that the rights of men are?
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following physical properties is not typical of a non-metal?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements best describes the path taken by Vietnam following independence? A. Vietnam immediately became
    11·2 answers
  • I need help with this please
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!