President Truman had a very difficult decision to make in terms of dropping the atomic bomb. Before dropping the bomb, Truman was hoping to get an unconditional surrender from Japan after the demands made at the Potsdam Conference. However, Japan refused.
Instead of dropping the atomic bomb, he also considered an invasion of mainland Japan. However, this invasion was estimated to have millions of casualties total and would have resulted in the deaths of thousands of Allied forces and Japanese military personnel.
Ultimately Truman decides to drop bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, effectively ending World War II. Even though this was a weapon of massive destruction, he argued that this actually saved lives. He used the estimated number of deaths/casualties from the possible land invasion to justify his decision.
<span>The correct answer is letter c, which is, it takes a subjective case-by-case approach to the question of incorporation in regards with the supreme court’s use of selective incorporation. The case-by-case approach is a way of using a decision forcing case in which the individual involved is likely to play a role of having to face a hard decision that occurred in the past.</span>
Answer:
The Treaty of Versailles was not a reasonable punishment for Germany because they were not the ones who started the war and they were not the only ones who fought for the Axis/Central Powers.
Explanation:
The amount of money the Germans had to pay should have been split between the other countries who fought with Germany and Austria-Hungary should have gotten this blame/Punishment but they didn´t because Germany was more powerful and stronger than the other Countries that were on the same side. It also stripped Germany´s 13% of its land, along with the population. Germany was forced to pay 269 billion while their Military was also stripped down in numbers.
Executive agreements? OR An autocrativacry?
