Answer:
They became more concerned with foreign policy.
Explanation:
The tenth commemoration of the 9/11 assaults has turned into an event for reconsidering the fear mongering danger to the United States. Three key inquiries have been raised. What is the status and current quality of al-Qa'ida, the gathering that executed 9/11? Have measures taken since 9/11 made Americans any more secure today? Why has the United States not been assaulted once more—in any event in the feeling of being assaulted on a scale moving toward 9/11? These are beneficial inquiries, despite the fact that they each include a confined point of view toward psychological oppression and counterterrorism. The first is naturally constrained by being centered around just a solitary assortment of fear mongering or even only a solitary gathering. The second more often than not precludes reference to any standard of progress and disappointment in verifying Americans from psychological oppression or to the expenses and exchange offs involved in getting a given level of wellbeing. The third inquiry is normally longing for a clarification that would be too easy to even think about being a precise examination of what has decided the measure of psychological oppression coordinated against the United States during the previous decade.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the statements. Without the statement, we do not what are the options to answer this question.
However, what we can do to help you is to answer this question based on our knowledge of the topic.
A statement that could describe the Second Red Scare and McCarthyism is "a time in US history when Senator McCarthy used of accusations, blacklisting, and investigations against suspected communists."
We are referring to Wisconsin Republican Senator Joseph McCarthy who in those Cold War years accused that many members of the US federal government and the US military were supporting Communist activities in the mid-1950s. McCarthy just accused people but never offer a serious argument or proof, so he ended up being a liar and his political career ended.
What Do You Need Answered?
