1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
astra-53 [7]
3 years ago
6

Which statement is true about knights? A. Knights wore their armor wherever they went. B. Knights began as pages when they were

seven or eight years old. C. Knights lived in monasteries. D. Knights helped the peasants farm their land during peaceful times.
History
2 answers:
marta [7]3 years ago
5 0
A. Knights wore their armor wherever they went.
larisa [96]3 years ago
4 0
The right answer is A
You might be interested in
The picture was taken during which war?<br> A. World War II<br> B. Korean War<br> C. Vietnam War
cricket20 [7]

The picture was taken in the Vietnam War.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do Madison's checks work? Is the fact that they "clog the administration" a good thing? Why or why not?
Sveta_85 [38]
<span>Madison didn’t originate the idea of checks and balances for limiting government power, but he helped push it farther than anyone else before or since. Previous political thinkers, citing British experience, had talked about checks and balances with a monarch in the mix, but Madison helped apply the principle to a republic. Contrary to such respected thinkers as Baron de Montesquieu, Madison insisted checks and balances could help protect liberty in a large republic. AMONG the numerous advantages promised by a well constructed Union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction. The friend of popular governments never finds himself so much alarmed for their character and fate, as when he contemplates their propensity to this dangerous vice. He will not fail, therefore, to set a due value on any plan which, without violating the principles to which he is attached, provides a proper cure for it. The instability, injustice, and confusion introduced into the public councils, have, in truth, been the mortal diseases under which popular governments have everywhere perished; as they continue to be the favorite and fruitful topics from which the adversaries to liberty derive their most specious declamations. The valuable improvements made by the American constitutions on the popular models, both ancient and modern, cannot certainly be too much admired; but it would be an unwarrantable partiality, to contend that they have as effectually obviated the danger on this side, as was wished and expected. Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith, and of public and personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable, that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority. However anxiously we may wish that these complaints had no foundation, the evidence, of known facts will not permit us to deny that they are in some degree true. It will be found, indeed, on a candid review of our situation, that some of the distresses under which we labor have been erroneously charged on the operation of our governments; but it will be found, at the same time, that other causes will not alone account for many of our heaviest misfortunes; and, particularly, for that prevailing and increasing distrust of public engagements, and alarm for private rights, which are echoed from one end of the continent to the other. These must be chiefly, if not wholly, effects of the unsteadiness and injustice with which a factious spirit has tainted our public administrations.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
According to this excerpt from The Social Contract, what do the people and the government agree to as a part of the contract?
Degger [83]

Answer:

People give up some rights in exchange for security from government.

Explanation:

The main thing you need to know about the social contract is that the people give up some rights in order for their government to maintain peace and stability.  

4 0
3 years ago
국가가 어떻게 형성되었는지 ......​
podryga [215]

Explanation:

Creating a country

Another complicating factor in setting up a country is the fact that, for one territory to become a new state, another already existing sovereign state must lose some of its territory. That would violate the laws and norms of territorial integrity. These are some of the oldest and most steadfast rules underpinning the international system.

Recognition of a new state essentially means legally recognising the transfer of sovereignty over a territory from one authority to another. An international body, including the UN, cannot just take away territory without the permission of the original “host” state. To do so would be a violation of one of the defining rules of the system of states.

Kosovo, for example, declared independence from Serbia in 2008 but even to this day it doesn’t have sovereign statehood – despite more than half of the UN’s member states recognising its independence. This is largely because Serbia still claims sovereign control over the territory, although other factors are certainly also at play. In the same way, Iraq would have to relinquish sovereign control over territory in order for Kurdistan to become a state.

There are obvious competing and contradicting legal principles here. In at least one instance, these contradictions appear together within the same law. Indeed, what we find is that there is no clear legal path to obtaining sovereign statehood. There is also no legally established mechanism for who determines whether a territory becomes a sovereign state. So we have to look at previous examples to work out how it’s done.

Catalan president Carles Puigdemont addresses an independence rally. EPA

The world’s most recent states are South Sudan, which was recognised in 2011 and East Timor, which was recognised in 2002. In the early 1990s, there was a wave of new states due to the collapse of the Soviet Union and the breakup of Yugoslavia. In 1993, Eritrea also became a state after a decades-long war with Ethiopia, which had annexed Eritrea in 1962. Prior to that, the world’s new states emerged out of the shifting or collapse of empires, most notable with the end of colonialism.

For East Timor and South Sudan, and in many ways Eritrea, statehood was part of attempts to resolve another problem: violent conflict. In all three cases, the host state (Indonesia for East Timor; Sudan for South Sudan; Ethiopia for Eritrea) agreed to relinquish control of the territory as part of negotiated peace agreements.

All of these new states obtained sovereignty after the disappearance of their former sovereign power, or with the permission of their former sovereign power. What they all have in common is that they became states in order to resolve some kind of problem, meaning there was some international benefit to their recognition. For the world’s newest states, their recognition was more of a political act than a legally defined process.

Translation

설명:

국가 만들기

국가를 설정하는 또 다른 복잡한 요소는 한 영토가 새로운 국가가 되려면 이미 존재하는 다른 주권 국가가 영토의 일부를 잃어야 한다는 사실입니다. 그것은 영토 보전의 법률과 규범을 위반하는 것입니다. 이것은 국제 시스템을 뒷받침하는 가장 오래되고 가장 확고한 규칙 중 일부입니다.

새로운 국가의 승인은 본질적으로 한 권위에서 다른 권위로 영토에 대한 주권 이전을 법적으로 승인하는 것을 의미합니다. UN을 포함한 국제기구는 원래 "주최" 국가의 허가 없이 영토를 빼앗을 수 없습니다. 그렇게 하는 것은 국가 시스템의 정의 규칙 중 하나를 위반하는 것입니다.

예를 들어 코소보는 2008년 세르비아로부터 독립을 선언했지만 오늘날까지도 UN 회원국의 절반 이상이 독립을 인정하고 있음에도 불구하고 주권 국가가 없습니다. 이는 주로 세르비아가 여전히 영토에 대한 주권을 주장하고 있기 때문입니다. 물론 다른 요인도 작용하고 있습니다. 마찬가지로 이라크는 쿠르디스탄이 국가가 되려면 영토에 대한 주권을 포기해야 합니다.

여기에는 명백한 경쟁적이고 모순되는 법적 원칙이 있습니다. 적어도 한 경우에 이러한 모순은 동일한 법칙 내에서 함께 나타납니다. 실제로 우리가 발견한 것은 주권 국가를 획득하는 명확한 법적 경로가 없다는 것입니다. 또한 영토가 주권 국가가 될지 여부를 누가 결정하는지에 대한 법적으로 확립된 메커니즘이 없습니다. 그래서 우리는 그것이 어떻게 이루어졌는지 알아내기 위해 이전의 예를 살펴보아야 합니다.

카탈루냐 대통령 카를레스 푸이그데몬트(Carles Puigdemont)가 독립 집회에서 연설하고 있다. EPA

세계에서 가장 최근의 국가는 2011년에 인정된 남수단과 2002년에 인정된 동티모르이다. 1990년대 초반 소련의 붕괴와 유고슬라비아의 해체로 새로운 국가의 물결이 일어났다. 1993년에 에리트레아도 1962년에 에리트레아를 합병한 에티오피아와의 수십 년 간의 전쟁 끝에 하나의 국가가 되었습니다. 그 이전에 세계의 새로운 국가는 제국의 이동 또는 붕괴에서 등장했으며, 가장 두드러진 것은 식민주의의 종식과 함께였습니다.

동티모르와 남수단, 그리고 여러 면에서 에리트레아에게 국가는 또 다른 문제인 폭력적 갈등을 해결하려는 시도의 일부였습니다. 세 가지 경우 모두 주최국(동티모르의 경우 인도네시아, 남수단의 경우 수단, 에리트레아의 경우 에티오피아)은 협상된 평화 협정의 일환으로 영토 통제를 포기하는 데 동의했습니다.

이 모든 새로운 국가는 이전 주권이 사라진 후 또는 이전 주권의 허가를 받아 주권을 획득했습니다. 그들 모두의 공통점은 그들이 어떤 종류의 문제를 해결하기 위해 국가가 되었다는 것입니다. 즉, 그들의 인정에 국제적 혜택이 있다는 의미입니다. 세계의 최신 국가들에게 그들의 승인은 법적으로 정의된 절차라기보다 정치적 행위에 가깝습니다.

7 0
3 years ago
What faction of nobles and others fled France hoping to undo the revolution and restore the old regime?
Yuri [45]
Emigres fled France hoping to undo the revolution and restore the old regime
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are some of the things from the transcontinental railroad
    6·1 answer
  • The pope claimed he was the head of Byzantine churches only.
    13·2 answers
  • He was elected as Georgia's 82nd Governor in January of 2011.
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following was an American weakness during the Revolutionary War? A) Americans were not used to wilderness warfare.
    8·2 answers
  • For each sentence, choose a historical detail that helps clarify your understanding from the drop-down list.
    14·2 answers
  • Need help with answer
    10·2 answers
  • What was a result of Gibbons v. Ogden?
    13·2 answers
  • What are the changes that emerged out of the Renaissance in religion and the sciences​
    5·1 answer
  • How did early settlers cope with challenges as they established Jamestown?)
    11·2 answers
  • What specific role does a bill's sponsor play?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!