<span>Maximum area = sqrt(3)/8
Let's first express the width of the triangle as a function of it's height.
If you draw an equilateral triangle, then a rectangle using one of the triangles edges as the base, you'll see that there's 4 regions created. They are the rectangle, a smaller equilateral triangle above the rectangle, and 2 right triangles with one leg being the height of the rectangle and the other 2 angles being 30 and 60 degrees. Let's call the short leg of that triangle b. And that makes the width of the rectangle equal to 1 minus twice b. So we have
w = 1 - 2b
b = h/sqrt(3)
So
w = 1 - 2*h/sqrt(3)
The area of the rectangle is
A = hw
A = h(1 - 2*h/sqrt(3))
A = h*1 - h*2*h/sqrt(3)
A = h - 2h^2/sqrt(3)
We now have a quadratic equation where A = -2/sqrt(3), b = 1, and c=0.
We can solve the problem by using a bit of calculus and calculating the first derivative, then solving for 0. But since this is a simple quadratic, we could also take advantage that a parabola is symmetrical and that the maximum value will be the midpoint between it's roots. So let's use the quadratic formula and solve it that way. The 2 roots are 0, and 1.5/sqrt(3).
The midpoint is
(0 + 1.5/sqrt(3))/2 = 1.5/sqrt(3) / 2 = 0.75/sqrt(3)
So the desired height is 0.75/sqrt(3).
Now let's calculate the width:
w = 1 - 2*h/sqrt(3)
w = 1 - 2* 0.75/sqrt(3) /sqrt(3)
w = 1 - 2* 0.75/3
w = 1 - 1.5/3
w = 1 - 0.5
w = 0.5
The area is
A = hw
A = 0.75/sqrt(3) * 0.5
A = 0.375/sqrt(3)
Now as I said earlier, we could use the first derivative. Let's do that as well and see what happens.
A = h - 2h^2/sqrt(3)
A' = 1h^0 - 4h/sqrt(3)
A' = 1 - 4h/sqrt(3)
Now solve for 0.
A' = 1 - 4h/sqrt(3)
0 = 1 - 4h/sqrt(3)
4h/sqrt(3) = 1
4h = sqrt(3)
h = sqrt(3)/4
w = 1 - 2*(sqrt(3)/4)/sqrt(3)
w = 1 - 2/4
w = 1 -1/2
w = 1/2
A = wh
A = 1/2 * sqrt(3)/4
A = sqrt(3)/8
And the other method got us 0.375/sqrt(3). Are they the same? Let's see.
0.375/sqrt(3)
Multiply top and bottom by sqrt(3)
0.375*sqrt(3)/3
Multiply top and bottom by 8
3*sqrt(3)/24
Divide top and bottom by 3
sqrt(3)/8
Yep, they're the same.
And since sqrt(3)/8 looks so much nicer than 0.375/sqrt(3), let's use that as the answer.</span>
First, let's put all of the variables together.
4m + 5m + 5 + 40 = 180.
Add them.
M is the same multiplier, so we can add 4 and 5 together to make 9m.
Add 5 and 40.
9m + 45 = 180.
From here, we can go two ways. I will show the first way, which is my personal preference.
We want to get rid of the coefficient on m to isolate it, so we must divide it by its coefficient. The coefficient on m is 9. So, divide m by 9. We must also divide everything else by 9.
9m/9 = 1m
45/9 = 5
180/9 = 20
Plug it in--
m + 5 = 20.
Subtract the 5 from both sides to isolate m.
m = 15.
Greetings!
"<span>Heather measured a swimming pool and made a scale drawing. In real life, the pool is 45 meters long. It is 65 millimeters long in the drawing. What scale did Heather use for the drawing?"...
65mm=</span>45m<span>
Reduce to Simpliest Form.
</span>65/5=<span>45/5
13mm=9m
As a Representative Fraction (scale), it would look like: (in regards to mm)
13:9000
Hope this helps.
-Benjamin</span>
Answer:
4/27 ezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
