Answer:
The bombing of Pearl Harbor prompted the United States to finally enter World War II.
Explanation:
Answer:
1740 until her death in 1780.
Explanation:
Answer: many funds went to the military only to be wasted
Explanation:
D) a reversal of religious toleration policies
Explanation:
- Shah Jahan was the ruler who marked a transitional period in the history of India under Muslim rule. At the end of the seventeenth century, it was clear that the Mogul Empire was beginning to decline.
- The military and the court were too expensive for the state budget, and the rulers continued to invest in lavish cultural achievements, neglecting the agriculture on which all that wealth was based. The
- economic crisis came to light during the reign of Aurangzeb (1658-1707), who believed that the solution to the crisis lay in the greater discipline of Muslim society.
- His insecurity was particularly reflected in his murderous hatred of Muslim "heretics" as well as members of other faiths.
- The heirs abandoned his policy, but the damage had already been done. Even the Muslims themselves were dissatisfied: there was nothing truly Islamic in Aurangzeb's ardent fulfillment of Sharia. Specifically, Sharia advocates justice for all, including the winters. Thus the Mughal Empire began to disintegrate, with local Muslim governors striving to take control of their territories as independent state units.
Learn more on Mughal Empire on
brainly.com/question/1841123
brainly.com/question/1373518
brainly.com/question/909715
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
Explanation:
The meaning of democracy – from the Greek word – demokratia – is “rule by the people”. As a system of government, it is now almost universally commended. To describe a country, or a policy, as “undemocratic” is to criticise it and those countries that are undemocratic are continually urged towards reform.
Yet, democracy is a complex and contested notion. Moreover, until relatively recently, the idea of rule by the people was as much (if not more) feared as loved. The ancient Greek philosopher Plato, for example, related democracy to the rule of unbridled and untutored passions over cool and reflective reason. Invoking a now common image of the ship of state, Plato asks whether a real ship in stormy waters is sensibly governed by a trained captain who has knowledge of seamanship and navigation or by the crew who have no specialist training. This seems a good question, and although such views are no longer part of the currency of intellectual thought, democrats continue to worry about the role of civic education, for example, in moulding a population so that its members do not just rule, but rule by informed decision making.
