Answer:
A. Protestant.
Explanation:
The Mennonites are a sect or group of Christian believers that was founded by Menno Simons. They are also known as the Anabaptists, a radical reform sect of the Christian faith.
They do not identify themselves as either Protestant or Catholics but also adhere to some of the Christian faiths and beliefs. Their name Anabaptists do not mean they are "anti-baptists" but rather "rebaptizers". They did not entirely oppose the teachings of either the Catholic or Protestant faith, but also disagree with some of them. They also have their own set of beliefs and rules, though not entirely devoid or contradictory to the Christian faith. They are in fact, a member of the Protestant church of the Christian faith.
The answer is attitude. Attitude is well defined as information
and good or bad feelings about something. In psychological studies, attitude is
referred to as a psychological construct, a mental and emotional entity or
persona which shapes a person. Attitudes can be attained by certain experiences
in one’s daily life.
B) right to refuse taxation by the government
hope I helped!
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
