Progressed, succeeded, achieved, determined, advanced
The following are some causes for a bank balance to differ from a company's balance: Deposits in transit, Charges for printing checks and bank services, Accounting mistakes at the business.
<h3>What are financial statement audits mostly focused on?</h3>
- In a financial statement audit, the auditor is able to determine with a reasonable degree of assurance whether there are no major misstatements in the financial statements.
- Cash can easily stolen or misplaced. As a result, it's critical to put internal controls in place to protect these assets and ensure that only authorized individuals have access to them.
- A fundamental internal control process is to deposit all cash receipts in the bank as soon as possible. Cash receipts are frequently deposited by businesses each day.
- The following are some causes for a bank balance to differ from a company's balance: Deposits in transit, Charges for printing checks and bank services, Accounting mistakes at the business.
To learn more about Accounting mistakes at the business refer to:
brainly.com/question/25671660
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is:
- Dr Interest receivable 303
- Cr Interest revenue 303
Explanation:
The total interest Sheffield Company will charge during the four months is $1,212, equivalent to $303 per month. Since only one month has passed since the debt was made, Sheffield should record revenue for one month interest:
- Dr Interest receivable 303
- Cr Interest revenue 303
Answer:
Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury.
Explanation:
The above question is incomplete as there are several answer options which are listed below;
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury as long as Lexi was in the room when she got
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury
• Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury
• Lexi can hold the manufacturer liable for Jill's injury.
The above answer - Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury, is true according to the rule of privity of contract. The rule states that a person who is not a party to a contract does not have right to sue or be sued and to enforce the obligations arising from the contract, unlike a person who is a party to the contract.
With regards to the above scenario, Lexi, who buys a food processor is the party to the contract here, hence can sue and be sued in case of any injury suffered by her, however, Jill whom food processor was loaned to, is the third party here, hence not covered by the rule of privity of contract.
