Answer:
Managers must ensure that their individual goals and work - as well as that of their direct reports - is in line with the overarching strategy. Then, you can ensure that your people are driving progress daily. Proper strategic alignment ensures the work of your best talent is being effectively and efficiently utilized
Answer: The total manufacturing cost variance is made up of direct material cost variance, direct labor cost variance and factory overhead cost variance. (Option C).
Explanation:
Some of the goals of manufacturing companies are to increase company’s revenue and profit. To achieve this, a company needs to know how to manage its costs and these may cause variances in manufacturing.
The total manufacturing cost variance is made up of direct material cost variance, direct labor cost variance and factory overhead cost variance. These costs are the differences between the actual cost incurred and the set cost. These variances help managers to know if the company is meeting up to the required standard.
Answer:
the holding period return is 3.77%
Explanation:
The computation of the holding period return is shown below:
Holding period return is
= (Income + (Selling price - Purchase price)) ÷ Purchase price
= ($3 + ($52 - $53)) ÷ 53
= 3.77%
Hence, the holding period return is 3.77%
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
<em>If the marketing managers at Peyton Bike's Inc. decide to sell each bike at a price lower than $2,000 per unit</em><em>, a shortage of bikes will be created.</em>
<h3>Why are bikes in short supply?</h3>
As a result, additional problems like plant shutdowns and disruptions as well as the unheard-of increase in bike orders during the peak of the coronavirus pandemic have added to the supply chain difficulties. The sector has never before experienced such a massive increase in demand as it has over the past two years.
learn more about<em> </em>shortage of bikes here <u>brainly.com/question/13000057</u>
#SPJ4
Answer:
C. To enforce property rights
Explanation:
Government intervention in market can be non materistically via regulation , materistically via taxes & subsidy.
Although the second materislistic way of tax, subsidy comes under the perview of 'Government Budget' .
Government budget is anual financial statement showing economy's expected revenue & expenditure .
Economic growth & stability by reallocation of resources , reducing income inequalities - reflect 'efficiency' & 'equity' as valid reasons .
Foreign protection is also not invalid depending upon the initial budding stage of a developing economy & its global stand. Eg - India 1950 to 1990 .
However all these are progressive legitimate reason for govt. Intervention .
But , enforcing property rights is a feature of 'socialistic (communistic) economy - which has its own demerits like loss of consumers soveireignity , lack of postive competitive efficiency , govt overburden.
