The psychological drive to eat that is influenced by social cues and customs is called:<u> </u><u>Hunger</u><u>: social </u><u>cause</u><u>.</u>
<u />
<h3>What is social cause?</h3>
Social cause can be defined as something that tend to have effect on people in a community.
Hunger is the psychological drive to eat based on the fact when a person is hungry the person will start to crave for food or crave for what to eat.
Therefore The psychological drive to eat that is influenced by social cues and customs is called:<u> </u><u>Hunger</u><u>: social </u><u>cause</u><u>.</u>
<u />
Learn more about social cause here:brainly.com/question/741324
#SPJ1
Explanation:
Iron has many uses but as far its chemical properties and the given options are concerned, following uses of iron are due to its chemical properties:
* When iron is put into fire, it produces sparks which are colored, which are not produced by mostly metals. Its purely because of the chemical properties it possess.
* When iron is placed in the water and oxygen, it rusts. When we place iron outside in the open air, when it is thrown some water, after few days you will see that iron has started rusting. This process is purely depends on the iron's chemical properties.
porphyry is an igneous rock containing conspicuous crystals called phenocrysts surrounded by a matrix of finer-grained mineral. <span>both alkali and plagioclase </span>feldspars<span> occur as irregularly shaped grains with only a few or no </span>crystal<span> faces hope it helps</span>
Assuming you mean the Ottoman Empire, the Turks had a massively different mindset. The Byzantine were not religiously tolerant and they actively sought out the conversion of the Turks and other Muslim population. While the ottomans actively gave control of their own land to the Dhmiri a christian estate that payed moderate taxes for religious freedoms. Also the Byzantines had no African or Asian Ambitions like the Ottomans. The Greeks were more interested in Italy the anything else. The Ottomans on the other hand set up one of the largest transcontinental empire ever seen.<span />
Answer:The nullification crisis was a United States sectional political crisis in 1832–33, during the presidency of Andrew Jackson, which involved a confrontation between the state of South Carolina and the federal government.
Explanation:
The nullification crisis was a United States sectional political crisis in 1832–33, during the presidency of Andrew Jackson, which involved a confrontation between the state of South Carolina and the federal government.
