The correct answer is an objective concept.
Explanation:
We must first define Ethical and Moral Standards for Warfare.
For thousands of years, War was seen as a means to an end, the winner takes all, and a social consequence where the winner is allowed to loot and murder.
However, Abrahamic religions such as Islam, brought the concept of a proper code of conduct for Soldiers and rules on how to interact with an Army that had lost a war.
Today, in our modern world, the United Nations has its own charter and a governing body which oversees what it calls War Crimes and crimes against humanity.
The UN has a perfect set of charter and code of conduct which define the moral conduct that needs to be followed by soldiers nowadays.
However, after the United States use of torture in Iraq without any international pressure, it seems like not many nations are still willing to accept a globally codified war code of conduct.
An alliance is an agreement made by two or more parties to secure common goals and to defend the other party in case of war. They were formed to prevent war and to maintain a balance of power. But one event could lead up to a huge conflict.
The alliances are the main reason behind World War 1 because they turned what was meant to be a brief war between accuser and accused into a world war. How the alliances turned a brief war into a world war is a classic case of one thing led to another.
In short and in general, formal language is the language you would use when talking to your boss or employes and informal language is the one you use when talking to a friends
Francisco Pizarro
Manco Inca initially had good relations with Francisco Pizarro and several other Spanish conquistadors. However, in 1535 he was left in Cuzco under the control of Pizarro's brothers, Juan and Gonzalo, who so mistreated Manco Inca that he ultimately rebelled.
