Answer:
The answer is The Cache Sets (S) = 32, Tag bits (t)=24, Set index bits(s) = 5 and Block offset bits (b) = 3
Explanation:
Solution
Given Data:
Physical address = 32 bit (memory address)
Cache size = 1024 bytes
Block size = 8 bytes
Now
It is a 4 way set associative mapping, so the set size becomes 4 blocks.
Thus
Number of blocks = cache size/block size
=1024/8
=128
The number of blocks = 128
=2^7
The number of sets = No of blocks/set size
=128/4
= 32
Hence the number of sets = 32
←Block ←number→
Tag → Set number→Block offset
←32 bit→
Now, =
The block offset = Log₂ (block size)
=Log₂⁸ = Log₂^2^3 =3
Then
Set number pc nothing but set index number
Set number = Log₂ (sets) = log₂³² =5
The remaining bits are tag bits.
Thus
Tag bits = Memory -Address Bits- (Block offset bits + set number bits)
= 32 - (3+5)
=32-8
=24
So,
Tag bits = 24
Therefore
The Cache Sets = 32
Tag bits =24
Set index bits = 5
Block offset bits = 3
Note: ←32 bits→
Tag 24 → Set index 5→Block offset 3
There´s PowToon, GoAnimate, ToonBoom. There are more, but these are the ones that I know about. I hope that I helped. Have a good day!
It can be noisy and distracting to students to listen to audio speakers when there are multiple computers in the classroom. Headphones help the students
Incomplete question. However, I answered from a general IT perspective.
<u>Explanation:</u>
It is important to note that the internet |(or real internet) in this case, refers to a global network of interconnected networks (internetworks) linked together for the purpose of communication. In other words, it is a broad global network arranged in a mesh network topography form.
It is also important to <em>remember </em>that nobody owns the internet, in other words, it is open an source network. So some internet service providers (ISPs) have a business model where they make revenue by having users pay in other to have the internet service delivered to them.
Answer:
a) Generate a new public and private key
Explanation:
You encrypt a message using the recipient's public key and the recipient decrypts the message using his own private key. Only the public key can be known by an external agent. The private key is for the individual and is not expected to be shared. In the event that the recipient cannot decrypt the message, it is unsafe to send one's private key to him. He does not even need one's private key to decrypt the message, he needs his own private key.
The best thing to do is to generate another means of security by generating new public and private key so that the sender encrypts the message with the new public key and the receiver decrypts it using his new private key.
Option B is wrong because, if the encryption is removed, the aim, which is to secure the message from intruders is not achieved.
