Answer:Ok i will help you here are some reasons why
Explanation:The death penalty is irreversible. Absolute judgments may lead to people paying for crimes they did not commit. Texas man Cameron Todd Willingham was executed in Texas in 2004 for allegedly setting a fire that killed his three daughters. Following his execution, further evidence revealed that Willingham did not set the fire that caused their deaths. But it came too late.There is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than a prison term. In fact, evidence reveals the opposite.
Since abolishing the death penalty in 1976, Canada’s murder rate has steadily declined and as of 2016 was at its lowest since 1966.The 2006 execution of Angel Nieves Diaz, by a so-called ‘humane’ lethal injection, took 34 minutes and required two doses. Doctors have said that it is likely Diaz’ death was painful.
Other brutal methods of execution used around the world include hanging, shooting and beheading. The nature of these deaths only continues to perpetuate the cycle of violence and may not alleviate the pain already suffered by the victims’ family.Executions are often undertaken in an extremely public manner, with public hangings in Iran or live broadcasts of lethal injections in the US. According to UN human rights experts, executions in public serve no legitimate purpose and only increase the cruel, inhuman and degrading nature of this punishment.
“All executions violate the right to life. Those carried out publicly are a gross affront to human dignity which cannot be tolerated,” said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui, Amnesty International’s Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa.In 2017 two countries – Guinea and Mongolia – abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
Today, 106 countries (the majority of the world’s states) have turned their backs on the death penalty for good.Those that continue to execute are a tiny minority standing against a wave of opposition.
There are countless arguments for and against the death penalty. In an imperfect world where we can never be sure we have ever got the “worst of the worst” is it ever justified to take a life?
Answer:
soliloquy: talking to yourself
monologue : talking to others
Explanation:
A monologue is when there's more than one party involved, like two people talking to each other, but essentially all the talking is done by one person. Imagine a parent scolding a child, and the child doesn't respond. Or a comedian performing alone on stage in front of an audience. There's only one person speaking... but to someone else.
A soliloquy also implies only one person talking... but it's mostly in cases where there's no other participant in the communication. Like when you're talking to yourself. So, there's only one person talking again, but not to any one else.
We can see that the outcome of assigning costs is to help provide information to help managers improve decision making.
We can then deduce that there are some costs that might vary and when they are assigned might not be what is actually in the market.
<h3>What is cost accounting?</h3>
Cost accounting refers to form of accounting that helps to provide detailed cost information. The information gathered helps the management to make informed decisions. It also helps them to control operations and plan for the future.
We can see that for example a company's supplier might have assigned a cost to a particular goods. But getting to the market, he discovers that it has been changed. That change can result to another outcome not intended by the manager.
Learn more about cost and price on brainly.com/question/25565797
Is pollution harmful to the animals of the earth?
