Answer:
The need for teaching art and music in schools is important as it ensures better emotional development of students and also enables in shaping their personalities. Studies show that music has the power to relax the mind and is a wonderful method of removing stress. Nobody can argue that art and music can help students rest after their long hours of studying hard. There are many scientific types of research showing that music and art could reduce stress and improve human health. Students are still growing, and their presence for stress is lower than adults. Therefore, they need music and art to decrease the risk of depression.
Experts argue that the intrinsic pleasures and stimulation of art and music do more than sweeten an individual’s life. The experience of making choices and decisions in the course of creating art and learning music carries over into other parts of life and enables students to experiment and try new ideas, thus giving their creativity a chance to bloom. When students are encouraged to express themselves creatively they develop a sense of innovation that will help them in their life.
Another advantage of teaching art and music in secondary schools is that the talent of students in those subjects can be discovered when they are learning. The teachers are capable of assessing the students’ abilities and can help the students to develop that aptitude.
Art and music are thus a great way to encourage the process and the experience of thinking and enhancing one’s personality.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is the third one!
Explanation:
Because it doesn't have any misplace words or anything and I Aced the test so... :)
Answer:
Explanation:
ok so i think i have only one answer cause i can't really see much but the second one is ARE the third one is the second choice for the third one
Read Commentary: American flag stands for tolerance
, by Ronald J. Allen
Allen concludes his editorial: "With controversy comes debate, enlightenment and renewed commitment. Perhaps, then, we are in the court’s debt for not treating the flag-burning case like the simple case it is. Let the controversy rage. After all, it is in robust debate that we are most true to ourselves."
Why is it difficult for scholars, judges, and lawmakers to balance robust speech protections with the necessity of maintaining a peaceful society? Provide evidence, examples, and/or scenarios.
Answer:
Allen states that tolerance is at the center of the debate. While those against the Court´s decision claim that a message can be sent in more peaceful ways, those who support it consider that a different outcome would be a governmental intrusion in political speech and a violation of the 1st amendment. Although Allen clearly states his support of the resolution, he does consider that the debate is necessary to further develop tolerance and a better understanding between the opposing positions.
Explanation:
The author refers to a case of flag burning that had the Supreme Court ruling that people have the right to do such a thing to protest against the government.
he killed a lot of vampires, then became the president of their country