1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pochemuha
3 years ago
13

[The Constitution] is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural

and familiar or novel and even shocking ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States.
This quote from the 1905 dissent to the Lochner v. New York decision tells us that

Question 1 options:

A. the Constitution exists to put forth a single view of good governance.
B. the divisions among people will be solved by the Constitution.
C. whether a view is familiar or shocking does not determine if it is constitutional.
D. the Constitution contains nothing shocking.
English
1 answer:
disa [49]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

C. whether a view is familiar or shocking does not determine if it is constitutional.

Explanation:

In other words, what the quote indicates is that the Constitution was created for people and, as everybody knows, people are different. In this way, opinions will not affect all individuals in the same way, and they are not responsible for deciding about the constitutionality of the statutes which represent these opinions.

You might be interested in
PLEASE ANSWER WITHIN 5 MINUTES, I DONT HAVE MUCH TIME!
Sloan [31]

Your question has been heard loud and clear.

Answer is option A , because they decided to reduce the power of state governments to prevent abuse of power. So that is why those 'restrictive' clauses/laws are there.

Thank you

8 0
3 years ago
What statement is always true of fiction?
telo118 [61]

Answer:

Where’s the statement

3 0
2 years ago
The jam is on ......... of the bridge.
nirvana33 [79]

Answer:

huh

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Is the doctrine that knowledge occurs through pure reason.
satela [25.4K]

The Kant's Critique of Pure Reason outlines the doctrine that states knowledge occurs through pure reason.

<h3>What does Critique of Pure Reason explains?</h3>

The Critique describes how a priori knowledge is provided by pure reason and how knowledge is provided by a transcendental unity of reason and experience.

Hence, the Kant's Critique of Pure Reason outlines the doctrine that states knowledge occurs through pure reason.

Read more about Pure Reason

<em>brainly.com/question/61301</em>

#SPJ1

6 0
1 year ago
Ur the total opposite of boring? What is that mean? is that a good thing or a bad thing?
elena55 [62]

Answer:

that would be a good thing

Explanation:

it means your fun to be around

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How does the allusion to the Boston Tea Party reinforce King’s argument about civil disobedience?
    15·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt below and answer the question. The shadow of the dome of pleasure (line 31) The symbolism in this line points t
    7·1 answer
  • Tuck everlasting plz help
    11·1 answer
  • Complete these sentences by using given words into present simple tense. 1.My friend ____ me.(he|p) 2.I ____ late on Saturday.(s
    6·1 answer
  • Seriously need help!! First correct and full answer gets brainliest
    10·1 answer
  • Reupload: Read First To answer the question
    7·2 answers
  • Which sentence uses the word silhouettes correctly?
    12·2 answers
  • True/False<br><br> The purpose of a parody is to entertain.
    14·2 answers
  • What is the difference between patriotic songs and political songs
    12·2 answers
  • PLS jak najszybciej daje naj
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!