<span>his book basically represents what happened during the holocaust ... just in a different form. The terrible things (a.k.a. the Nazis) take away the animals (a.k.a. the different groups of people persecuted during the holocaust) one at a time because it was easy. The Nazis in real life did the same thing. By taking groups one at a time no large uproar was caused. If they had taken more animals, there might have been a larger negative reaction and possibly a revolt. The animals were able to justify the other animals being taken away, and by justifying the terrible thing's reasoning and actions they made it easier for the terrible things to continue. As for the last question ... often people do not listen to one lone voice in a crowd, especially one that in young and supposedly "inexperienced." Unfortunately for us, children are often able see things in a different and more "black and white" light, and by not listening to what they have to say we all lose out. H</span>
Effective communicators: D. check for feelings based on nonverbal cues.
<h3>What is an effective communication?</h3>
An effective communication can be defined as an act that typically involves conveying information (message) efficiently and effectively from a sender to another (recipient) without any redundancy.
<h3>What are
barriers to communication?</h3>
Barriers to communication refers to can be defined as anything that prevents the successful transmission, receipt and understanding of a message by the parties that are involved in a communication.
As a general rule, an effective communicator must be aware of the frames of reference and views of the recipient of an information (message).
In this context, we can infer and logically deduce that effective communicators check for feelings based on nonverbal cues.
Read more on communication here: brainly.com/question/26152499
#SPJ1
