Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
Answer:
Justice of the Peace courts.
Sheriff courts.
Explanation:
the correct answer is
C.
Love God with all your heart and soul. because god sent him as a messenger for god and as a sacrifice for us
The given statement is false.
<span>The Omaha experiment randomly assigned eligible police calls regarding domestic violence into three categories, which are;
arrest
separation
and mediation</span>
I believe the answer is: <span>Exchange; communal
Exchange relationship refers to the type of relationship that initiated because we're expecting a certain benefit/reward from the relationship.
Communal relationship refers to the type of relationship that initiated because we're interested in improving the general well being of the other partner.</span>
