The argument above is a deductive reasoning. A deductive reasoning draws a conclusion from a series of premises that are held to be true. The argument also employs no informal fallacy. The confusion lies though on the first premise if it is true.
Answer:
Probably not, because the terms are not definite.
Explanation:
A contract is considered to be valid when there is a written or expressed agreement for one party to deliver goods or services to another.
The terms are clearly stated. For example the price, time of sale, acceptance of price, and so on.
A valid contract has the following elements: offer, acceptance, agreement, and consideration.
In the given scenario where Kelly tells Matthew that she will sell him one of her motorcycles at some time in the future and Matthew eagerly accepts. There is an agreement but there is no specific offer and consideration of price and also the time of transaction.
So the contract is probably not valid because terms are not clearly defined.
It’s a process that can be used to separate pure liquids from a mixture of liquids
Answer:
5,500 units
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Given that
Need to sell the units in a month = 4,000 units
Beginning inventory = 1,000 units
Desired ending inventory = 2,500 units
So, by considering the above information, the units to be produced is
= Desired ending inventory + need to sell the units in a month - beginning inventory
= 2,500 units + 4,000 units - 1,000 units
= 5,500 units
<span>The answer to this question is unfreezing stage.
Unfreezing stage is the stage of preparing the people to move and leaving the
comfort zones. In this stage, in order for the unfreezing stage to become
successful, the managers or leaders should command employees to embrace change
end educate the people that change is needed to reach the company’s goal.</span>
