Both A and B so answer C.
Answer: 61,390 liters
Explanation:
If materials were added at the beginning, they will be 100% accounted for at the end of the process.
Equivalent Units = Units started and completed + Ending inventory
= Units completed - Beginning WIP + Ending inventory
= 59,110 - 2,900 + 5,180
= 61,390 liters
Dividing tasks between employees always eliminates the possibility of collusion, but this is wrong.
Segregation of duties is important for effective internal control because it reduces the risk of errors or improper conduct. Preventing collusion helps fight fraud.
Separation of duties is an important practice to reduce the occurrence of errors and fraud by ensuring that employees do not have the opportunity to commit or conceal errors or fraud in the performance of their duties. That is internal control.
Separation of duties reduces the risk of fraud or misconduct as each affected employee has access controls and restrictions in place. Task division is delegating different steps of the process to different people to delegate important functions.
To learn more about collusion
brainly.com/question/14409158
#SPJ4
For a monopolist, price is above marginal revenue.
<h3>What is monopolist market?</h3>
A monopolist market is a market with managed alone.
The price of commodity should be greater than marginal revenue this is because until marginal revenue and cost are balance the business cannot expand.
But a high price above the revenue will equal to profit.
Learn more on monopolist market below
brainly.com/question/13113415
#SPJ1
Answer: option 3
Explanation:
Background to the case:
The cases involving the explosion of Ford Pinto's due to a defective fuel system design led to the debate of many issues, most centering around the use by Ford of a cost-benefit analysis and the ethics surrounding its decision not to upgrade the fuel system based on this analysis.
Basis of analysis:
Should a risk/benefit analysis be used in situations where a defect in manufacturing could lead to seriously bodily harm and even worse death, such as in the Ford Pinto situation?
Rule of the court:
There hasn’t really been a definite decision about the case and arguments both for and against such an analysis have been made. It is an economically efficient method which has been accepted by courts for numerous years, however, juries may not always agree, so companies should take this into account.
Discretion is expected to be used.
