Answer:
Mischel proposed that behaviors are determined mostly by "SITUATIONAL CUES". Up to that point, psychologists in his field had believed that "TRAITS" were responsible for a person’s behavior. Mischel’s idea has come to be called "MISCHEL'S COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE PERSONALITY MODEL", and the debate over it is known as the "PERSON"/situation debate.
Explanation:
Previously existing trait theories suggests that a person's behavior depends on his/her traits, and they are consistent in different situations.
Walter Mischel criticized this theory and suggests that the way people behave is determined by the situation they find themselves in, and not just the traits they possess. His idea is known as "Mischel's cognitive-affective personality model".
The debate between Mischel and the proponent of trait theories is called the "trait vs state" or the Person-Situation debate.
Answer:
The correct option is B) A purposive incentive
Explanation:
Incentives can be described as rewards given to person due yo their outstanding work.
A purposive incentive can be described as a cause which is served by a person who is passionate about the action or event.
In the scenario discussed in the question, Brandon is contributing to the environmental work because he is an environmentalist and gets satisfaction by doing it. This, itself is a reward. Hence, the scenario is example of purposive incentive.
We need to increase the number we have German D I mean GDP we have the US doesn't increase are we increasing yes we are so what's the treaty so what's my company tell me the company is right in front of us so we're looking around to see the increase
The main idea is <span>Factory workers are degraded at work and at home on a daily basis.
The excerpts above describes the past situation where factories did not even provide necessary salary to sustain the living of their hard-working labors, but they never had a chance to change jobs because they couldn't find another opportunity.</span>
Answer:
Trait approach
Explanation:
The trait approach theory was first given by Gordon Allport in the 1930s. It is also called a trait theory of leadership. In the beginning, there was found about 4500 traits that were later combined and finalized into three categories.
The trait theory has been criticizing because this theory has very little generalization results in their traits theory as not applicable to most of the great leaders. This theory focuses on the leadership but not on the situation.