Answer:
Wagner Enterprises and Stone Services
Disposal of old asset:
It could be that Stone Services exchanged its old asset with a new one with a company. In that situation, the debit goes to New Equipment, while the credit is to the old Equipment. Another reason could be that Stone Services sold the old asset on account. In this situation, the debit goes to the Accounts Receivable account, while the old asset is credited accordingly.
Explanation:
When a company disposes of an old asset, it credits the asset account and transfers the amount to the Sale of Asset account. The same is done for the accumulated depreciation, in reverse. When cash is realized from the disposal, the Sale of Asset account is credited, while Cash account is debited. Then, the difference in the Sale of Asset account will be a gain or a loss, depending on the net book value and the cash realized from the sale.
Answer:
The options are not correct:
Dr costs of good sold $15,800
Cr inventory $15,800
Explanation:
The 4,400 units sold consist of the 2,400 units purchased on 1 January at $4.00 per unit and the balance of 2,000 units from the purchase made on January 12 at $3.10 per unit
cost of goods sold=(2,400*$4)+(2,000*$3.10)=$15,800
The cost of goods sold is $15,800 ,neither is it $11,900 nor $11,800
The appropriate entries is to debit costs of good sold with $15,800 while merchandise inventory is credited with $15,800
Answer:
a.
Explanation:
Based on the information it can be said that in this scenario either party can appeal the decision to the United States Supreme Court if a federal question is involved. This means that there is an issue within the case that involves the constitution or other federal laws. These types of issues are cause for being able to take the case to the Supreme court.
Answer:
$1,068.02
Explanation:
For computing the selling price of the bond we need to use the Future value formula or function i.e to be shown in the attachment below:
Given that,
Present value = $1,000
Rate of interest = 10% ÷ 2 = 5%
NPER = 3 years × 2 = 6 years
PMT = $1,000 × 8% ÷ 2 = $40
The formula is shown below:
= FV(Rate;NPER;PMT;-PV;type)
The present value comes in negative
So, after applying the above formula, the selling price of the bond is $1,068.02
Answer:
d. The maintenance costs associated with the napkin folding machine.
Explanation:
The cost that required one or more processors to produced a final product is known as joint cost
Here in the given question, the maintenance cost is not considered to be a joint cost as this cost are associated with the paper napkins
Also, the pulping, screening, rolling, etc are considered to be joint cost
Hence, the correct option is d.
