Why did Romans create a written code of law, The correct option is B to allow citizens to see and understand the law
<h3>
What does Roman law actually mean?</h3>
The traditional law and legislation of the assemblies, resolutions of the senate, enactments of the emperors, edicts of the praetors, and writings of the jurisconsults.
And the codes of the later emperors serve as the foundation for the ancient Roman legal system, which includes both written and unwritten law.
Hence the correct answer is option B.
Learn more about the roman Law:
brainly.com/question/13741410
#SPJ1
Answer:
People lived more towards lakes and rivers instead of caves, and tree trunks. This led to the change of the jobs of the society. Unlike Paleolithic time's, man could have more leisure time to spend. This led him to broaden the society he was living in and led to increased populations in the Neolithic Age.
Explanation:
Sjdjskjsjsjsjw sksksks s :)
Answer:
Explanation:In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of an historical account.[1] It usually involves challenging the orthodox (established, accepted or traditional) views held by professional scholars about a historical event or time-span or phenomenon, introducing contrary evidence, or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then results in revised history. In dramatic cases, revisionism involves a reversal of older moral judgments.
At a basic level, legitimate historical revisionism is a common and not especially controversial process of developing and refining the writing of histories. Much more controversial is the reversal of moral findings, whereby what mainstream historians had considered (for example) positive forces are depicted as negative. Such revisionism, if challenged (especially in heated terms) by the supporters of the previous view, can become an illegitimate form of historical revisionism known as historical negationism if it involves inappropriate methods such as:
the use of forged documents or implausible distrust of genuine documents
attributing false conclusions to books and sources
manipulating statistical data
deliberately mis-translating texts
This type of historical revisionism can present a re-interpretation of the moral meaning of the historical record.[2] Negationists use the term "revisionism" to portray their efforts as legitimate historical revisionism. This is especially the case when "revisionism" relates to Holocaust denial.
Modern U.S. presidents are fully aware of the importance of the economy. More than ever, the pulse of the nation’s economy is of the utmost importance for the White House.
In a global scenario, the role of economics through trade has been increasingly important. The president of the U.S. dedicates a considerable part of his time to oversee the Department of Commerce, the Department of Treasure and is very aware of the declarations of Federal Reserve and the bankers, to avoid a crisis like the one that happened in 2008
