1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OleMash [197]
3 years ago
5

what are some similarities and differences between presidential reconstruction and radical reconstruction

History
1 answer:
defon3 years ago
3 0

Abraham Lincoln's plan of Reconstruction was conceived to reunite a divided country with a healing hand. His motives can best be summarized by the words from his second inaugural address, which advocated that the United States heal itself "with malice towards none, with charity for all." This plan was centered on the ten percent rule. This magnanimous provision stated that the former Confederate states would be welcomed back into the Union once ten percent of their voters publicly swore their loyalty to the country. The states would then be permitted to draft new state constitutions and elect their legislatures. Amnesty would be given to all but the highest-ranking Confederates who swore loyalty. Lincoln hoped that this generous and kind approach would encourage the rebels to accept defeat.

You might be interested in
which three battles in the South were key enforcing the British under General Cornwell's to abandon the Carolinas and head to Vi
belka [17]

King's Mountain, Cowpens, Guilford Courthouse

Explanation:

After the battle of Camden Cornwallis was regarded as a hero in Britain.

But after that battle Cornwallis decided to move himself on the soil of North Carolina, which proved as a bad decision.

In these three mentioned battles Cornwallis didn't managed to fulfill his goal.

This is why he moved himself on the soil of Virginia, where the famous battle of Yorktown happened.

Learn more on General Cornwallis on

brainly.com/question/748788

brainly.com/question/973

#learnwithBrainly

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which two details would be best to include in a discussion of military regimes in Myanmar and Indonesia? Select all that apply.
spin [16.1K]

Answer:

- house arrest of Aung San Suu Kyi

- seizure of East Timor

Explanation:

Myanmar and Indonesia have both been ruled by military regimes for quite a while now. In Myanmar the military regime did not allowed the elected president of the country Aung San Suu Kyi to be in office, but instead they occupied the government offices and continued to rule, while their political opponent was sent in home prison for over a decade. Indonesia on the other hand has had an expansionist politics, and it is weird how the international community hasn't reacted to it, especially because the country managed to break every single human right. One of the invaded territories is Timor, occupying half of the island, the western one, persecuting people, murdering on ethnic and religious base, exploiting the resources.

5 0
4 years ago
Our Study of the Boston Massacre showed:
a_sh-v [17]

Answer:

the colonists used the event as a piece of propaganda

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Use the drop-down menus to complete the statements.
kirill115 [55]

The ethnic group with the largest presence in western Austria-Hungary was the Germans.

Explanation:

The ethnic group  that was dominant in the culture and politics of the Austro Hungary and also had dominance with the largest presence in western Austria-Hungary was the German population.

This was also the reason of their closer ties with Germany as there were a majority of German speaking people in these nations too.

These German ethnic gorps were also the ones that were in the position of ruling the empire of Austro Hungary and held virtually all important offices in the country.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Cross-checking information is important in determining the accuracy of a source because
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

Cross-checking information is important since it is one of the main methodological sources of validating knowledge in areas such as History, Law and Social sciences. Cross-checking is to History just as the scientific method to Physics. The claims and authenticity for example of some documents are validated through the use of this procedure.

The results of cross-checking information also occur in some settings where field research is carried. It can be used when engaging in anthropological or sociological research. An example of it is seen when interviews are carried in mental health institutions, to patients, to doctors, families, and surveys also are checked against people that are related to the object of study. These are corroborated with people who can help or provide unbiased knowledge on the inquiries.  See below ... :)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which war is this cartoon criticizing?      A. World War II   B. World War I   C. Korea   D. Vietnam
    11·2 answers
  • How did guilds help members and families of members?
    12·1 answer
  • What does Confucius believe about the five relationships among people
    7·2 answers
  • Describe what entrepreneurs do
    7·2 answers
  • What view did the new Republican Party and free soil party share
    7·1 answer
  • How did the United States acquire the land that became Kansas and Nebraska?
    10·2 answers
  • Write a Introduction paragraph about did President Kennedy. (Do in your own words.)
    7·1 answer
  • Why did President Polk order General Zachary Taylor to set up forts along the Rio Grande?
    11·1 answer
  • HELPP PLEASE!I’ll mark YOU BRAINLy! And please don’t just guess
    15·1 answer
  • Who am I?: I advocated for a strong navy. I was the longest-serving member of the House of Representatives. I was always known t
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!