A. Sumer river was the location along the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers in the land of Mesopotamia.
Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
I believe the trading relationship between Mexico, Canada, and United states would be the one that most impacted.
The existence of NAFTA allows better movement of Factors of Production between the three nations. Dissolving NAFTA would most likely increase the import/export tax between this nations and could also lead to the dissolvents of many jobs.
Answer:
it was either to hide their cities or it was for spiritual reasons correct me if I'm wrong
Explanation:
