Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer:
Readjusting once again to marketplace conditions, the next year the company produces 65,000 phones, with a retail price of $45. At the end of the year, the company’s sold almost its total supply of phones. It indicates that the equilibrium quantity of phones is 65,000, at a retail price of $45 (which would be the equilibrium price). More Resources
Explanation:
According to our curve, the equilibrium point initially is indicated by point E on the graph, but since the supply of cellphones has increased, quantity supplied increases to the graph indicated by S 1 S 1, this causes an excess of the product in the market resulting in a stiff competition which often sees the sellers reduce their prices. hope that helps.
Germaine is operating in a perfectly competitive market. As there are many competing florists, each selling somewhat unique floral arrangements, earning zero economic profits in the long run.
<h3>What is perfectly competitive market?</h3>
Perfectly competitive market is considered when all the competitors have same items and has no influence on pricing, and companies can enter and exit the market at any moment.
The market without restriction, customers have perfect or complete information, and companies are unable to set prices, according to economic theory.
Thus, the situation is of perfectly competitive market.
For more details about perfectly competitive market, click here
brainly.com/question/26028930
#SPJ1
When the initial cost of Machine A is $6,000 and that of Machine B is $8,500, then both the machines will have the same current value at the end of 10 years.
<h3>What is the meaning of current value?</h3>
The present market value of an asset that prevails in the market is known as the current value of an asset. Using the given conditions, the current value will be the same as computed under,
Putting the given value and solving further we get,
Hence, the significance of current value is aforementioned.
Learn more about current value here:
brainly.com/question/8286272
#SPJ1
Answer:
Rise
Explanation:
A monopoly is defined as a market situation where only one seller determines the supply and price of a product, because they are the only ones that produce it.
When forms make technological advancements, they are able to make processes cheaper. So there is more money saved that can be used to increase production.
In this scenario for every product manufactured there is a $40 saved. This excess cash can be put back into the production to increase the output and profit.
