Answer:
Expected Net Cash Flow = $3.8 million
Net Present Value (NPV) = $1.0492 million
Explanation:
Given Cash outflow = $10 million
Provided cash inflows as follows:
Particulars Good condition Moderate condition Bad Condition
Probability 30% 40% 30%
Cash flow $9 million $4 million $1 million
Average expected cash flow each year = ($9 million X 30 %) + ($4 million X 40%) + ($1 million X 30%) = $2.7 million + $1.6 million + $0.3 million = $4.6 million
Three year expected cash flow = ($4.6 million each year X 3) - $10 million = $13.8 million - $10 million = $3.8 million
While calculating NPV we will use Present Value Annuity Factor (PVAF) @12% for 3 years = 
NPV = PV of inflows - PV of Outflows = $4.6 million X 2.402 - $10 million = $11.0492 million - $10 million = $1.0492 million
Expected Net Cash Flow = $3.8 million
Net Present Value (NPV) = $1.0492 million
Answer:
<h2>In the context of Consumer Theory or Indifference Curve involving two goods,the opportunity of any one good is computed by how much of the other good is foregone or sacrificed to purchase one more unit of that particular good.</h2>
Explanation:
- In this instance,when Bill's diner consumes 35 burgers and 25 hotdogs,its opportunity cost of additional hot dog=
.Therefore,initially Bill diner's opportunity cost of an additional hot dog is 1.4 units of burger.
- Now,when Bill's diner chooses to consume a combination of 25 burgers and 65 hot dogs,its opportunity cost of additional hot dogs=
approximately.Hence,Bill's diner is willing to sacrifice approximately 0.385 units of burger to consume an additional unit of hot dog. - Now,due to the change in consumption combination,the change in opportunity cost of additional hot dog=
units of burger.Notice,that here the opportunity cost of additional hot dog decreased from 1.4 units of burger to 0.385 units of burger as Bill's diner changed the consumption combination of both burgers and hot dogs.
Exact interest method is using 365 days instead of 360.
We are going to use the formula: I = Prt, we will derived
the formula of rate.
r = I /Pt would be our formula, plugging in our amounts.
r = 93.37 / 2000 / (284/365)
= 93.37 / 2000 (0.7781)
= 93.37 / 1556.1643
= 0.06 or 6% when converted to percent.
To check:
I = Prt
= 2000 x 0.06 x 284/365
= 120 x 0.7781
= 93.37
Answer:
equitable relief
Explanation:
A court refers to an enclosed space such as a hall or chamber where legal practitioners (judges, lawyers or attorneys and a jury) converge to hold judicial proceedings.
A lawyer refers to an individual who has obtained a law degree and is saddled with the responsibility of giving legal advice, initiate and execute lawsuits for his or her clients. These legal practitioners are saddled with the legal responsibility of listening to evidence and give a verdict about legal cases.
An equitable relief also referred to as equitable remedy can be defined as judicial remedies granted to an aggrieved person by a court of equity, requiring that the other party act or refrain from indulging in a specific act because ordinary legal remedies couldn't provide the aggrieved party sufficient (adequate) restitution for an offense commited against him or her. Thus, an equitable relief (remedy) is an injunction granted by a court of equity requiring a party to a contract to either act (mandamus or specific performance) or refrain from indulging in a particular act.
In this context, when a court of competent jurisdiction awards or grants custody of a child to one parent rather than awarding it to the other, this is an example of equitable relief.
In conclusion, an equitable relief or remedy is typically a nonmonetary judgement granted by a court of equity when ordinary legal remedies fail to provide sufficient (adequate) restitution to an aggrieved party.
Answer:
a) true
Explanation:
Support Function include Information Technology, Human Resources, Finance and Marketing. These are there to ensure that conversion process is efficient by providing support services such as sourcing of talent, fund management, communication.
