Answer:
One of the most valuable lessons is to breathe before responding to a message heard in a conversation. In this lesson she makes a logical appeal, showing that when you breathe you give your brain time to understand the message and respond to the height, thus creating a quality conversation.
Explanation:
Celeste Headlee has shown how we human beings have diminished our ability to be good listeners and to establish good communication and quality conversation with each other. She says that this unavailability and haste to listen is not satisfactory, does not stimulate the brain and does not allow learning that only communication is capable of establishing. Technology has contributed to making this problem worse, making conversations automatic, fast and without satisfactory interaction.
Headlee says that we have to learn to listen in order to learn to talk and the best way we can do that is to enter into conversations without haste, listening to what is said and breathing before answering. This breath promotes reasoning, the interpretation of the message received and the elaboration of a message to the height, which will be received in the same way. That way a good conversation is conducted.
It depends on where it's from. You know when you mail a letter to a far away friend, it takes a couple of days? Well, once the item is out of the post office, it's shipping to its destination, but that doesn't mean they'll get it that day.
If you ordered something from China, then it'll take a few weeks. If you ordered something in your state, a few days. If you ordered something from next door, you'll get it the next day.
Hope this helps! Have a happy New Year!
Answer:
What was the purpose of Ronald Reagan's Challenger speech?
As the nation's leader, President Reagan decided to address the country about the Challenger tragedy. Putting aside his scheduled State of the Union address before Congress, the President instead delivered an Oval Office address to comfort the people as the nation mourned.
Explanation:
your answer hope this helps i looked it up good luck
Answer and Explanation:
The statement appeals to authority because it relies on the doctor's expertise on the subject of health to support the claim that longer resources are needed in schools. Appeal to authority is a fallacy in which something is claimed to be true because it is said or defended by a supposed expert, or authority, on the matter. A doctor is indeed an expert when it comes to the subject of health. Still, Enzo's statement can be seen as an appeal to authority, since he is indeed using the doctor's authority to support his opinion.
