I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
According to freud's theory, melissa's <u>"id"</u> would tell her to grab the doll and keep it as her own whereas her<u> "superego"</u> would tell her that taking another girl's doll would be wrong.
The id is the impulsive (and oblivious) some portion of our mind which reacts straightforwardly and quickly to the impulses. The identity of the infant tyke is all id and just later does it build up a ego and super-ego.
The superego's capacity is to control the id's driving forces, particularly those which society disallows, for example, sex and hostility. It likewise has the capacity of convincing the sense of self to swing to moralistic objectives as opposed to just practical ones and to take a stab at flawlessness.
I think it's either A or D
1. Italy
2. Castelli
3. Napoleon
I hope this helped!
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
C. A high school math teacher who encouraged his own son to skip college and focus on learning a trade to "save all that wasted tuition money"
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
The reason why answer choice "C. A high school math teacher who encouraged his own son to skip college and focus on learning a trade to 'save all that wasted tuition money'" would be the correct answer because the high school teacher would have a "cognitive dissonance" in his response.
Cognitive dissonance is is having 2 or multiple beliefs in a topic, in this case, the high school teacher would have 2 beliefs in the topic of higher education.
The high school teacher believes that higher education is very important and that people need to get a higher education, but he tells his own son that the tuition that is going into college is "wasted money." This shows that the high school teacher has cognitive dissonance because he has two different beliefs. He believes that higher education is very important, but doesn't want his own son to pursue it because of the tuition costs.
<h3>I hope this helped you out.</h3><h3>Good luck on your academics.</h3><h3>Have a fantastic day!</h3>
