Answer: with increase in the price of beer lesser number of college students can consume/afford it.
Explanation: After analyzing Ben’s and Holly’s argument, we understand that price of beer is directly proportional to the taxes levied on beer, whereas inversely proportional with number of college students consuming it. Hence, with increase in price lesser number of students will consume it. This conclusion is obviously correct as college students have limited money to manage their expenses and affording expensive beer is not easy for them.
<span>Good Morning!
</span><span>To keep costs to a minimum for consumers
</span><span>
In theory, the government's interest in regulating natural monopolies is to meet consumer rights, giving access and lowering costs in order to avoid price abuse.
Hugs!</span>
What are the choices for it
Answer:
Topic: Biotic potential and environmental resistance
How do they fit in with what I already know?
Short answer only
Need help hehe :)
Explanation:
enviornmental resistance
