not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
Strain theory<span>, developed by Robert K. </span>Merton<span>, argued that society may be set up in a way that encourages too much deviance. </span>Merton<span> believed there was a disjunction between socially approved means to success and legitimate cultural goals. i dont own this</span>
Answer: Ecosystems are all found with each other;
Explanation:
Ecosystems are not isolated from each other but split from each other, most ecosystems are very big and cover a large amount of land so when another ecosystem is around it is seen to be together. Ecosystems merge together but still keep within their own land, this is why you might find certain animals in different ecosystems than the one they are from. Hope this helps!
Answer: socially responsible
Explanation:
Socially responsible investment are investments that have a positive impact on the environment and are socially responsible.
In this case, Sula is purchasing stock in corporations that produce environmentally friendly goods since a positive social impact is gotten from such company.
It has to do with the investment which involves sustainability of the environment, clean technology efforts and seeking of social justice.
A medium that early Native Americans used to share their culture and history is A. Totem poles.
<h3 /><h3>What are totem poles?</h3>
These were a sort of monuments that Early Native Americans constructed to showcase their history and culture.
They would set it up in a very visible place so that everyone in the community would see it, and the patterns and figures drawn would represent various cultural aspects.
Find out more on totem poles at brainly.com/question/1617423.
#SPJ
