Answer: I believe that is true :)
Explanation:
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
What is appealing about the personalized birth is that it creates the room for the woman to have her baby in the way that she wants it to be. With as many people as she wants present. It is unappealing because there would be fewer professional hands to help in the process in case the need arises for such.
<h3>What is personalized births?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the type of births that would be arranged by the people that are carrying the baby. It is usually carried out through their recommendations on the places that they want to have the baby and the ways that they may want things to go.
Hence we can say that What is appealing about the personalized birth is that it creates the room for the woman to have her baby in the way that she wants it to be. With as many people as she wants present. It is unappealing because there would be fewer professional hands to help in the process in case the need arises for such.
Read more on child births here: brainly.com/question/14316244
#SPJ1
