This specification is known as arbitration and is a part of the fair resolution process. If both parties agree, then the case can be taken to a different court that is not part of the national court system of the parties. Example can be going to the international court of justice in Strasbourg if you feel that your human rights were violated.
<u>Maitland and Gervis' study on goal setting and coaches found that, for goals to be effective, coaches should b</u>e engaged with the goal-setting process. The study was to use naturalistic inquiry and the social cognitive theories of motivation to identify and describe the motivational choices that players make as they go through the goal-setting process and examine the influence of the coach on this process. It means that goal-setting needs had to be examined in a broader context than goal-setting theory.
<em>In short, coaches should engage in an interactive and ongoing dialogue with players, taking into account the motivational needs of the players and their own to improve the effectiveness of setting goals as a technique, and hence their effectiveness as a coach.</em>
Answer:
You can consult Jschlatt about this topic, but until then I think I'll do.
Explanation:
In general, they don't care. That's why it's a sweatshop and not a normal business. The employers are typically in it for the money, which is why the conditions are so unideal (understatement). Someone who valued human life wouldn't force underpaid, malnourished children (or adults for that matter) to work in such horrible circumstances.
