Due to the increase in the price of the pizza, it is conclusive that the demand will decrease. Assume that the amount he will earn will stay the same and it is the product of the number of pizza and the price, the choice that would satisfy this is the third choice.
The government really just expected reduced highway fatalities. Even though that it costs these multibillion dollar companies a little more to let their drivers rest, it sill makes the roads safe for all drivers. Driving while tired is almost as bad as driving under the influence, so making sure that these truck drivers get sleep make sure everything is super safe for everyone.
The instrument that Shawn must use is “payable to the order of” before the name of the payee.
<h3>Requirements of Negotiability </h3>
- The first of the four major considerations is whether or not a paper is negotiable, and it is one that nonlawyers must address.
- Auditors, retailers, and financial institutions frequently handle notes and checks and must make quick decisions about negotiability.
- In a negotiable instrument, the only permissible promise or direction is to pay a particular sum of money. Any other promise or command renders negotiability null and void
- This restriction exists to prohibit an instrument from having an uncertain value.
- If the bearer of a negotiable instrument had to examine whether a provision or condition had been met before the thing had any value, the utility of the object as a substitute for money would be severely diminished.
Hence, the instrument that Shawn must use is “payable to the order of” before the name of the payee.
To learn more about the Negotiation instrument refer to:
brainly.com/question/9312091
#SPJ4
Answer:
D. Less; Less
Explanation:
Given that
CPI in 2005 = 1.68
Wage in 1972 = 7200
Wage in 2005 = 30,000
CPI in 1971 = 0.418
Therefore,
Real wage in 1972 = wage in 1972/CPI in 1972
= 7200/0.418
= $17,224.88
Real wage in 2005 = wage in 2005/CPI in 2005
= 30000/1.68
=$17,857.14
Thus, from the given data 1972 job paid LESS in nominal terms (7200 < 30000) and LESS in real terms (17,244.88 < 17,857.14) than the 2005 job.
