Answer: Table headers
Explanation: Give me the brainiest
Answer:
Explanation:
Example
Let us take this slowly by considering a bicycle. You are given 1 bicycle and you wish to sell it. 4 people are interested and think your price is fair.
so the supply is 1 bicycle
and the demand is 4 people
If those people are want the bicycle equally, what do you think could happen to the price of the bicycle? Shouldn't it go up? Especially if they are all willing to make side deals.
Supply: 1 bicycle
Demand: 4 people
Price goes up.
Now go back.
Suppose you have 10 bicycles and only 8 people are bidding on them. They are not really that interested. So you have to lower the price until someone bites.
Supply: 10 bicycles
Demand: 8 people.
Price goes down. The supply exceeds the demand.
<span>he Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed each territory to decide the issue of slavery on the basis of popular sovereignty. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri Compromise, which had kept the Union from falling apart for the last thirty-four years. The long-standing compromise would have to be repealed. Opposition was intense, but ultimately the bill passed in May of 1854. Territory north of the sacred 36°30' line was now open to popular sovereignty. The North was outraged.The political effects of Douglas' bill were enormous. Passage of the bill irrevocably split the Whig Party, one of the two major political parties in the country at the time. Every northern Whig had opposed the bill; almost every southern Whig voted for it. With the emotional issue of slavery involved, there was no way a common ground could be found. Most of the southern Whigs soon were swept into the Democratic Party. Northern Whigs reorganized themselves with other non-slavery interests to become the REPUBLICAN PARTY, the party of Abraham Lincoln. This left the Democratic Party as the sole remaining institution that crossed sectional lines. Animosity between the North and South was again on the rise. The North felt that if the Compromise of 1820 was ignored, the Compromise of 1850 could be ignored as well. Violations of the hated Fugitive Slave Law increased. Trouble was indeed back with a vengeance.</span>
They believed that the minors had invaded their territory.
The correct answer among all the other choices is " Carthage had attacked many settlements on the Italian Peninsula." This is why Rome went to war with Carthage. Thank you for posting your question. I hope that this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.
