Answer:
e. $42,857.14
Explanation:
The computation of the break-even level of earnings before interest and taxes between these two options is shown below:
(EBIT) ÷ (Number of shares) = (EBIT - Interest) ÷ Number of shares
(EBIT) ÷ (75,000 shares) = (EBIT - $20,000) ÷$40,000
40,000 × EBIT = 75,000 × EBIT - $1,500,000,000
35,000 × EBIT = $1,500,000,000
After solving this,
The EBIT would be $42,857.14
The interest expense
= $320,000 × 6.25%
= $20,000
Answer:
-$414,444.44
Explanation:
The computation of the net present value is shown below:
Net present value = Initial investment + net cash flows ÷ (required rate of return - projected growth rate)
= -$1,570,000 + $104,000 ÷ (12% - 3%)
= -$1,570,000 + $1,155,555.56
= -$414,444.44
Hence, the net present value is -$414,444.44
Since the net present value comes in negative so the project is rejected
<span>The death benefit of a(n) variable and universal life insurance policy may go down because of poor investment returns.
Universal life insurance and variable life insurance are two types of permanent life insurance, in this case if the the person who insured dies any time</span><span> as long as there is enough cash value to pay the costs of insurance in the policy, the death benefit will be paid. </span>
Answer: 15%
Explanation:
IRR is the discount rate that makes the NPV equal zero. Required rates of return that are less than the IRR will therefore result in a positive NPV and those that are higher will result in a negative NPV.
Use Excel to find the IRR.
= IRR(-328325,115000,115000,115000,115000)
= 15%
As the required rate of 13% is less than the IRR of 15%, the new machine will have a positive NPV.
Answer:
Option B (Put seller) is the appropriate alternative.
Explanation:
- Put seller relates to the practice including its opportunity to then be implemented. That whenever a put application is approved, this same writer typically takes the equality of opportunity at either the strike amount from the lengthy put grabber.
- Writing possibilities seems to be an opportunity for investors. That being said, the earnings from composing the given opportunity would be constrained to either the premium, although the put buyer could keep going to create revenue or gains until another inventory would be zero.
Some other three situations do not relate to either the type of situation in question. So there is one that is the appropriate one.
