1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
klio [65]
2 years ago
8

It is likely that you won’t like the prospect of paying more money each month, but if you do take out a 15-year mortgage, you wi

ll make far fewer payments and will pay a lot less in interest. How much more total interest will you pay over the life of the loan if you take out a 30-year mortgage instead of a 15-year mortgage?.
Business
1 answer:
faust18 [17]2 years ago
8 0

Based on the amount borrowed and the term of the loan, the amount more that you will pay in total interest over the life of the loan with the 30-year mortgage is $1,079,892.

<h3>How much more interest is paid?</h3>

The total payment to be made on the 30-year mortgage is:

= 7,200.29 x 30 years x 12 months per year

= $2,592,000

Total interest paid in 30-year mortgage:

= 2,592,000 - 700,000 amount borrowed

= $1,892,000

The total payment to be made on the 15-year mortgage is:

= 8,401.18 x 15 x 12

= $1,512,212.40

Total interest paid in 15-year mortgage:

= 1,512,212.40 - 700,000

= $812,212.40

The total interest that was paid more with the 30 year mortgage than the 15 year mortgage is:

= 1,892,000 - 812,212.40

= $1,079,892

Rest of the question is:

Your friends suggest that you take a 15-year mortgage, because a 30-year mortgage is too long and you will pay a lot of money on interest. If your bank approves a 15-year, $700,000 loan at a fixed nominal interest rate of 12% (APR).

Find out more on interest payments at brainly.com/question/28224394

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
A firm currently produces 1000 units of output and has total costs of $15,000 and fixed cost of $3,000. What is the firm’s avera
denpristay [2]

Explanation:

Explanation: The formula is ATC = AFC + AVC. Use this formula. It will be useful for you

5 0
3 years ago
How much would you have made or lost on an investment of $1 000
Ad libitum [116K]

Answer:

depends on how much you already have...

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
As part of the initial investment, ray blake contributes equipment that had originally cost $125,000 and on which accumulated de
Zielflug [23.3K]
Given:
Original cost of contributed equipment : 125,000

Accumulated depreciation of contributed : 100,000

Value of similar equipment : 150,000

Agreed upon valuation of contributed equipment : 29,000

The amount that should be debited to the equipment account is 29,000.

It is the current value of the contributed equipment as agreed upon by the partners.
6 0
4 years ago
Accounts receivable, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts is called:.
charle [14.2K]

Accounts receivable, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts is called  net realizable value.

<h3>What is net realizable value?</h3>

Net realizable value is the method of knowing the value of asset that is held as inventory. The purpose of this method is to avoid overstating or understating the value of an goods in inventory.

The net realizable value is the result of deducting the costs incurred in selling the goods from its selling price.

Hence, accounts receivable, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts is called  net realizable value.

Learn more about net realizable value here : brainly.com/question/794345

6 0
3 years ago
Lorenzo Peterson was swimming in a swimming pool with a friend at an apartment com­plex. Lorenzo watched his friend swim to the
Naya [18.7K]

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

1. Yes.

A design defect is when the design for a particular product brings about risk or injury which could have been averted if the design was done in another way.

With regard to the question, there is a design defect as we're informed that the drain cover becomes loose and we're further told that Sta-Rite did not install safety fea­tures on its drain pumps.

2. No.

Based on the scenario in the question, the ethical duty wasn't met by Sta-Rite Industries. They neglected the potential injury and harm that their design would cause. This means that they didn't perform their ethical duty well.

3. Yes.

In this case, Sta-Rite has to compensate the affected person and a punitive damage should further be added to whatever compensation had been put in place. This will serve as a way of making others also learn and always do the right thing and be safety conscious.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The average student who has completed four years of college has taken more than​ 2,600 tests. Educational systems contribute to
    8·1 answer
  • Potential real gdp = $200 billion natural rate of unemployment = 6 percent actual rate of unemployment = 12 percent refer to the
    15·1 answer
  • Bob is unemployed because his skills have become obsolete due to technological advances. this is ____ unemployment.
    9·1 answer
  • What is an example of impatience in economic behavior? eating a healthy diet every day insisting on getting a physical exam ever
    8·1 answer
  • On January 1, 2021, The Barrett Company purchased merchandise from a supplier. Payment was a noninterest-bearing note requiring
    15·1 answer
  • 26. Which NIMS Management Characteristic follows established processes for gathering, analyzing, assessing, sharing, and managin
    10·1 answer
  • Please add me on here i need friends please
    13·2 answers
  • A CPA issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of a company that sold common stock in a public offering subject
    5·1 answer
  • Having the authority to define their own tasks makes it likely that workers will ______.
    14·2 answers
  • An employee time ticket is an hour-by-hour summary of the employee’s activities throughout the day. True or false?.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!