1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
serg [7]
3 years ago
15

Which statement best explains the value of 16 − (−3)?

Mathematics
1 answer:
amm18123 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The additive inverse of −3 is +3, so 16 − (−3) = 19

negative 6 over 8 minus negative 1 over 8 = negative 5 over 8; therefore, the distance from A to B is absolute value of negative 5 over 8 equals negative 5 over 8 units

Because it is 3 units to the left of 2 on a horizontal number line

Step-by-step explanation:

The answers are the explanation.

Comment on the second question

Note that the second question asks for the distance from -6/8 to -1/8. Ordinarily, the distance from A to B would be computed as B - A. In this set of answer choices, it is computed as |A - B|. In the end, the result is the same.

Personally, I would compute the distance between points on a number line by subtracting the left point from the right point. Here, that would also correspond to B - A.

Comment on choosing 'word' answers

In a set of answers like these, one way to choose answers is simply to eliminate the ones that make a false statement. Often, you are left with only the correct answer choice.

For example, the statement "the additive inverse of -3 is -3" is a false statement, so the first two answer choices can be eliminated. Likewise, the statement 16 -(-3) = 13 is false, so that choice can be eliminated. The one remaining answer is the correct one.

have a good day hope this helped!

You might be interested in
Naval intelligence reports that 4 enemy vessels in a fleet of 17 are carrying nuclear weapons. If 9 vessels are randomly targete
icang [17]

Answer:

0.7588 = 75.88% probability that more than 1 vessel transporting nuclear weapons was destroyed

Step-by-step explanation:

The vessels are destroyed without replacement, which means that the hypergeometric distribution is used to solve this question.

Hypergeometric distribution:

The probability of x successes is given by the following formula:

P(X = x) = h(x,N,n,k) = \frac{C_{k,x}*C_{N-k,n-x}}{C_{N,n}}

In which:

x is the number of successes.

N is the size of the population.

n is the size of the sample.

k is the total number of desired outcomes.

Combinations formula:

C_{n,x} is the number of different combinations of x objects from a set of n elements, given by the following formula.

C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}

In this question:

Fleet of 17 means that N = 17

4 are carrying nucleas weapons, which means that k = 4

9 are destroyed, which means that n = 9

What is the probability that more than 1 vessel transporting nuclear weapons was destroyed?

This is:

P(X > 1) = 1 - P(X \leq 1)

In which

P(X \leq 1) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1)

So

P(X = x) = h(x,N,n,k) = \frac{C_{k,x}*C_{N-k,n-x}}{C_{N,n}}

P(X = 0) = h(0,17,9,4) = \frac{C_{4,0}*C_{13,9}}{C_{17,9}} = 0.0294

P(X = 1) = h(1,17,9,4) = \frac{C_{4,1}*C_{13,8}}{C_{17,9}} = 0.2118

Then

P(X \leq 1) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) = 0.0294 + 0.2118 = 0.2412

P(X > 1) = 1 - P(X \leq 1) = 1 - 0.2412 = 0.7588

0.7588 = 75.88% probability that more than 1 vessel transporting nuclear weapons was destroyed

8 0
3 years ago
How many quarts are there in 12 gallons and 3 quarts? enter the number only. Do not include units
lidiya [134]

Answer:

51

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
HELP PLEASE!!!!!!! I NEED FAST!!
forsale [732]

The answer is b) 8.625.

Add green and red peppers, then divide it by 1.5.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Corlos bought a book for $9 . now he would like to buy 4 other books for the same price .how much will he have to pay in all for
Rashid [163]
I'd do 9x4=36 because the 9 is from your money and the 4 is from your books. Now since you want to find out how much 4 books cost you just multiply that by 9
5 0
3 years ago
1 inch = 2.54cm 1 mile = 1.6km a map has a scale of 1 inch represents 1 mile use the given conversions to show that 1cm on the m
lara31 [8.8K]
Note: 1 inch = 2.54 cm is an exact converion, while 1 mile=1.6km is only approximate.

Using conversion
1 inch=2.54 cm
1 mile = 1760*3*12 = 63360 in = 160934.4 cm 
If 1 inch = 1 mile, then 
2.54 cm : 1 mile = 1.609344 km
1 cm : 0.6336 km   (exactly), or
1 cm : 0.6 km (approximately)

Using both conversions:
1 inch = 2.54 cm : 1 mile = 1.6 km
=>
2.54 cm : 1.6 km
1 cm : 1.6/2.54=0.6299 km (approximately), or
1 cm : 0.6 km (approximately)
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • -6k+7k how do I solve this
    9·2 answers
  • Question 5 (Fill-In-The-Blank Worth 1 points)
    14·1 answer
  • Is 2 thirds equivalent to 6 tenths
    7·2 answers
  • A relation is plotted as a linear function on the coordinate plane starting at point e (0, 27)(0, 27) and ending at point f (5,−
    15·2 answers
  • Tim has $20 to buy snacks for 12 people in an office. Each person will get one snack. Tim is buying bags of pretzels that cost $
    9·1 answer
  • Translate the word phrase into a math expression.
    9·2 answers
  • What is 62% of eighty
    7·2 answers
  • Look at the picture
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!! i’ll mark brainlest
    11·2 answers
  • Solve the pair of simultaneous equations<br> x = 4 - y<br> x = y + 2
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!