<h2>Answer:-) ✿ ✿ ✿ ✿</h2>
<h2>Civil courts (not to be confused with the civil-law legal system) </h2><h2>deal with “private” controversies, particularly disputes that arise between individuals or between private businesses or institutions </h2><h2>Explanation :-) </h2>
<h2>keep smiling ☺️ ♡</h2>
<h2>Sorry !! ☹️</h2>
<h2>follow back plzz </h2>
Answer:
Psychological arousal is very simimal for several emotions, so it is not always reliable for the polygraph to distinguish one emotion reaction from another. For instance guilt from other reactions.
Explanation:
The polygraph can most certainly determine if a person is nervous or not, because the nervous system reacts under testing situations, as well as other body reactions. This is not sufficient enought to deternmine wether someone is lying or not, is guilty or not. Someone can be nervous, and the polygraph can identify it, but this does not neccesarily mean a person can be found guilty.
I believe the answer is: re<span>troactive interference
</span><span>. retroactive interference refers to the occurence when new learned information is interfering with the past learned information.
This often cause the memory to interlap with one another which make Eric associate his current girlfriend with his old girlfriend's name.</span>
