The answer would most probably be letter b. unpredictable
The early start of the 1920’s had brought the US to an era of prosperity due to the industrialization of many factories in the US. By 1929, there was a big shift in the economy. The stock market crashed and led to the economic recession in the US.
The political followers of Thomas Jefferson took up the name "Democratic-Republicans," preferring this over the previous term "Anti-Federalists" since the Constitution had already be drafted and ratified.
The Oslo Accords simply did not take into account factors that would influence its interpretation. For example, the Cave of the Patriarchs massacre, in which at least 39 Palestinians were killed by a single Israeli gunman (who was beaten to death once he run out of ammunition), is often blamed for undermining Palestinian trust in the process. Similarly, the expansion of Israeli settlements (although the Oslo agreements, sillily enough, stipulated no such ban) and blockades caused the deterioration of economic conditions, and much frustration for Palestinians. These factors caused a drop in support for the accord and for those who supported it. However, the PA acknowledges that the settlements have actually provided 12,000 temporary jobs to Palestinian construction workers.
And on the Israeli side, the increase in terror attacks and refusal of the insurgency groups such as Hamas to respect the Oslo agreements caused much frustration for Israelis who lost faith in the Accords as well
Answer:
A.ultimate truth
A. true
Explanation:
The statement "The Rule of Law was made its supreme maxim" means that the rule of law is the ultimate truth.
Rule of law is the system that states that no one is above the law, both the ruler and the ruled, which makes it the ultimate truth or supreme maxim.
Furthermore, the use of force has to be objective in order to ensure that rights are not violated and upheld properly.
This is true, because one approach doesn't fit all, objectivity is needed.
